Cariñanos-Ayala Susana, Arrue Marta, Zarandona Jagoba, Labaka Ainitze
Vitoria-Gasteiz Nursing School, Osakidetza-Basque National Health Service, Jose Atxotegi s/n, 01009 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Basque Country, Spain; Bioaraba Health Research Institute, Basque Country, Spain.
Faculty of Medicine and Nursing, Department of Nursing, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Spain.
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Mar;98:104766. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104766. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
Nurse educators are required to prepare graduates for the increasing complexities of the practice environment. Debate is an active teaching strategy long recognised in many disciplines to promote student-centred learning by enhancing the development of communication skills, collaboration, and critical thinking, all of which are essential skill for future nurses.
The aim of this study was to compare in-class university structured debate implementation methods among undergraduate nursing students, and to identify the effect of such debate methods in the students' learning.
A systematic review of the literature.
Publications in English identified in multiple databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Medline and ERIC) from the launch of the database until 26th November 2019.
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guided the review. Studies that investigated the use of in-class debate among undergraduate nursing students as a pedagogical tool were eligible. Information related to the study design, debate process characteristics, evaluation method of the teaching strategy and results were collected.
We identified 14 relevant studies describing structured implementation of debate, 11 of which were instructional design and 3 quasi-experimental studies. Heterogeneity was found across the papers regarding topics, timing schedules, group formation and positioning. Most of the studies evaluated implementation using satisfaction questionnaires or subjective observations. Three quasi-experimental studies reported that implementation of debating improved declarative capacity, argumentative capacity, idealistic moral judgment, and realistic moral judgment.
Current studies do not provide enough evidence to understand the scope of structured debating as an instrument to develop personal competences needed in nursing. However, based on the evidence reviewed, we have identified elements to establish a debate-based learning format that might enhance student's learning and future studies.
护理教育工作者需要让毕业生为日益复杂的实践环境做好准备。辩论是一种积极的教学策略,长期以来在许多学科中都得到认可,它通过提高沟通技巧、协作能力和批判性思维的发展来促进以学生为中心的学习,而这些都是未来护士必备的技能。
本研究旨在比较本科护理学生课堂上大学结构化辩论的实施方法,并确定此类辩论方法对学生学习的影响。
文献系统综述。
从数据库建立至2019年11月26日在多个数据库(PubMed、CINAHL、科学网、Medline和教育资源信息中心)中检索到的英文出版物。
采用系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目来指导综述。研究本科护理学生课堂辩论作为教学工具使用情况的研究符合要求。收集了与研究设计、辩论过程特征、教学策略评估方法和结果相关的信息。
我们确定了14项描述辩论结构化实施的相关研究,其中11项为教学设计研究,3项为准实验研究。在论文中发现了关于主题、时间安排、分组和定位方面的异质性。大多数研究使用满意度问卷或主观观察来评估实施情况。三项准实验研究报告称,辩论的实施提高了陈述能力、论证能力、理想道德判断和现实道德判断。
目前的研究没有提供足够的证据来了解结构化辩论作为培养护理所需个人能力工具的范围。然而,根据所审查的证据,我们确定了一些要素来建立一种基于辩论的学习形式,这可能会提高学生的学习效果和未来的研究能力。