Caminiti Caterina, Diodati Francesca, Puntoni Matteo, Balan Denisa, Maglietta Giuseppe
Clinical and Epidemiological Research Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jan 27;22(2):177. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22020177.
Individual attitudes and knowledge can predict pro-environmental behaviors. Public surveys, therefore, can provide precious information, which can guide sensitization interventions. In this systematic review, we searched Medline and Embase, with no language or date restrictions, for surveys designed to measure in the general population the level of knowledge about different types of plastics, the risks associated with plastic pollution, and awareness of actions to reduce them. Survey tools were analyzed following the guide of Burns and Kho, and study methodological quality was assessed via the Appraisal Tool for Cross-Sectional Studies. We included 17 articles published from 2019 to 2024, mostly concerning European populations. The tools comprised a median of 13 items (range 7-50), and very differently formulated questions. Overall, 13/17 (76.5%) study questionnaires received less than 50% (<3.5) of the maximum possible score. The remaining four questionnaires obtained intermediate scores (between 3.5 and 5.3) indicating moderate quality. Most studies did not employ the appropriate cross-sectional survey methodology, only two studies statistically justified sample sizes, only three reported a sampling frame, and only two described a selection process that appears to be representative. In most cases, the instruments were not validated, and the statistical significance of key variables was not provided. The many shortcomings highlighted in this review emphasize the urgent need for methodological rigor when conducting survey studies, which are essential tools for public health.
个人态度和知识能够预测亲环境行为。因此,公众调查能够提供宝贵信息,用以指导宣传干预措施。在本系统评价中,我们检索了Medline和Embase,没有语言或日期限制,查找旨在测量普通人群对不同类型塑料的知识水平、与塑料污染相关的风险以及对减少这些风险的行动的认知的调查。按照Burns和Kho的指南对调查工具进行了分析,并通过横断面研究评估工具评估了研究方法的质量。我们纳入了2019年至2024年发表的17篇文章,大多涉及欧洲人群。这些工具的项目中位数为13项(范围7 - 50项),且问题表述差异很大。总体而言,17项研究中的13项(76.5%)调查问卷获得的分数低于最高分的50%(<3.5)。其余4份调查问卷获得中等分数(3.5至5.3之间),表明质量中等。大多数研究未采用适当的横断面调查方法,只有两项研究在统计学上证明了样本量的合理性,只有三项研究报告了抽样框架,只有两项研究描述了似乎具有代表性的选择过程。在大多数情况下,这些工具未经验证,也未提供关键变量的统计学显著性。本评价中突出的诸多缺点强调了在开展调查研究时迫切需要方法严谨性,调查研究是公共卫生的重要工具。