Amico Mattia Alexis, Tedesco Sabato, Piazzai Chiara, Grossi Guido, Busi Gherardo, Panichella Giorgia, Migliorini Angela, Meucci Francesco, Valenti Renato, Di Mario Carlo, Carrabba Nazario
Cardio-Thoraco-Vascular Department, Careggi Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 8;14(4):1075. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041075.
Over the past two decades, MitraClip™ therapy has proven to be an effective and safe treatment for severe mitral regurgitation (MR), with more than 200,000 patients treated globally through continuous advancements in device design and implantation techniques. This retrospective, observational, single-center study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of the latest generation of MitraClip compared to earlier models in the Real-World MitraClip Florence Registry. The primary efficacy endpoint was a comparison in terms of the rate of successful procedures, the time to device deployment and the duration of the hospital stay. The secondary safety endpoint regarded long-term all-cause mortality and hospitalization for heart failure. : Patients treated at our center from January 2016 to June 2022 were included. They were divided into two groups: those receiving early-generation devices (G1-G3) and those treated with the last-generation device (G4). All patients underwent a comprehensive preoperative echocardiographic assessment, with a re-evaluation before hospital discharge and after 12 months. A long-term follow-up focusing on all-cause mortality and hospitalization for heart failure was conducted. : Of 131 patients, 81 received the last-generation device. The mean age was 79.4 years. Both groups exhibited a high burden of comorbidities (overall mean = 2.85). Procedural success was high (97%) across groups, with a significantly better MR reduction (Grade ≤ 1) in the G4 group (47% vs. 70%, = 0.009). The time to device deployment was significantly shorter with the G4 system (72 vs. 135 min, < 0.001), and there was a trend towards shorter hospital stays (6.1 vs. 7.9 days, = 0.08). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated better 5-year survival rates for the last-generation device group ( = 0.019), with no significant difference in rehospitalization rates ( = 0.186). : The MitraClip G4 system in the real world for the treatment of severe MR is safe and effective, achieving immediate and durable procedural success, accompanied by an improved NYHA functional class. Moreover, a better long-term survival rate was observed, along with a comparable high rate of recurrent HF hospitalization, reflecting a high comorbidity burden in this frail population.
在过去二十年中,MitraClip™疗法已被证明是治疗严重二尖瓣反流(MR)的一种有效且安全的方法,通过设备设计和植入技术的不断进步,全球已有超过200,000名患者接受了该治疗。这项回顾性、观察性、单中心研究旨在评估在真实世界的MitraClip佛罗伦萨注册研究中,与早期型号相比,最新一代MitraClip的安全性和有效性。主要疗效终点是在成功手术率、设备部署时间和住院时间方面进行比较。次要安全终点是长期全因死亡率和因心力衰竭住院情况。纳入了2016年1月至2022年6月在我们中心接受治疗的患者。他们被分为两组:接受早期一代设备的患者(G1 - G3)和接受最后一代设备治疗的患者(G4)。所有患者术前均接受了全面的超声心动图评估,出院前和12个月后进行了重新评估。对全因死亡率和因心力衰竭住院情况进行了长期随访。在131名患者中,81名接受了最后一代设备。平均年龄为79.4岁。两组患者的合并症负担都很高(总体平均值 = 2.85)。各治疗组的手术成功率都很高(97%),G4组的二尖瓣反流减少情况明显更好(反流等级≤1)(47%对70%,P = 0.009)。G4系统的设备部署时间明显更短(72分钟对135分钟,P < 0.001),并且住院时间有缩短趋势(6.1天对7.9天,P = 0.08)。Kaplan - Meier分析显示最后一代设备组的5年生存率更高(P = 0.019),再住院率无显著差异(P = 0.186)。在现实世界中,用于治疗严重二尖瓣反流的MitraClip G4系统是安全有效的,能实现即刻且持久的手术成功,并改善纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心功能分级。此外,观察到更好的长期生存率,以及相当高的复发性心力衰竭住院率,这反映了这一脆弱人群中合并症负担较重。