Suppr超能文献

关节内注射透明质酸治疗膝骨关节炎:一项系统的伞状综述。

Intra-Articular Hyaluronic Acid for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Umbrella Review.

作者信息

Glinkowski Wojciech Michał, Tomaszewski Wiesław

机构信息

Center of Excellence "TeleOrto" for Telediagnostics and Treatment of Disorders and Injuries of the Locomotor System, Department of Medical Informatics and Telemedicine, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland.

Stichting Med Partners, 1098 XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 14;14(4):1272. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041272.

Abstract

to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of intra-articular hyaluronic acid (IAHA) in treating osteoarthritis (OA), considering innovations in formulations, comparative outcomes, and variability in guidelines. This review aims to synthesize evidence supporting the role of IAHA in multimodal treatment strategies. A general, narrative, umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses was conducted. Clinical practice recommendations and guidelines for IAHA use were also reviewed and evaluated. A comprehensive search was conducted across the main medical data sources. Inclusion criteria focused on studies evaluating the efficacy, safety, and impact of IAHA. Key outcomes included pain reduction (e.g., WOMAC, VAS), functional improvement, safety, and cost-effectiveness. IAHA showed moderate efficacy in pain relief and functional improvement, especially in early-to-moderate OA. The results indicate that hybrid formulations and combination therapies show better clinical outcomes, with expanded efficacy and potential chondroprotection. However, heterogeneity between studies was noted, reflecting variability in patient populations and intervention protocols. International guidelines varied significantly, with some opposing routine use (e.g., AAOS, NICE) and others endorsing IAHA more or less conditionally (e.g., ESCEO, OARSI). IAHA remains a treatment modality in the arsenal of selected populations of people with OA, especially for early and moderate disease. High-quality, standardized studies are still needed to refine IAHA's role and establish personalized guidelines for individual patients. A concerted effort to harmonize global recommendations and economic strategies, such as tiered pricing, can increase equitable access and optimize IAHA's integration of multimodal treatment for OA.

摘要

考虑到关节腔内透明质酸(IAHA)制剂的创新、比较结果以及指南的差异,评估其治疗骨关节炎(OA)的疗效、安全性和成本效益。本综述旨在综合支持IAHA在多模式治疗策略中作用的证据。对系统评价和荟萃分析进行了一般性的叙述性伞状综述。还对IAHA使用的临床实践建议和指南进行了审查和评估。在主要医学数据源中进行了全面检索。纳入标准侧重于评估IAHA疗效、安全性和影响的研究。关键结果包括疼痛减轻(如WOMAC、VAS)、功能改善、安全性和成本效益。IAHA在缓解疼痛和功能改善方面显示出中等疗效,尤其是在早中期OA中。结果表明,混合制剂和联合疗法显示出更好的临床结果,具有扩大的疗效和潜在的软骨保护作用。然而,研究之间存在异质性,反映了患者群体和干预方案的差异。国际指南差异很大,一些反对常规使用(如美国骨科学会、英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所),而另一些则或多或少有条件地支持IAHA(如欧洲临床和经济方面风湿病防治学会、骨关节炎研究学会国际)。IAHA仍然是选定OA患者群体治疗手段之一,特别是对于早期和中期疾病。仍需要高质量、标准化的研究来完善IAHA的作用,并为个体患者制定个性化指南。协调全球建议和经济策略(如分层定价)的共同努力,可以增加公平获取机会,并优化IAHA在OA多模式治疗中的整合。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1181/11856182/c62a5abfccc2/jcm-14-01272-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验