Bhandari Mohit, Bannuru Raveendhara R, Babins Eric M, Martel-Pelletier Johanne, Khan Moin, Raynauld Jean-Pierre, Frankovich Renata, Mcleod Deanna, Devji Tahira, Phillips Mark, Schemitsch Emil H, Pelletier Jean-Pierre
Division of Orthopaedics and Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, 293 Wellington Street, Hamilton, ON L8L2X2, Canada.
Center for Treatment Comparison and Integrative Analysis, Division of Rheumatology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2017 Sep;9(9):231-246. doi: 10.1177/1759720X17729641. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic condition characterized by a loss of joint cartilage and is a major cause of disability in Canada, with an estimated CN$195 billion annual cost. Knee OA leads to persistent pain and loss of function, and treatment goals primarily focus on symptom relief and retention of function. Intra-articular hyaluronic acid (IAHA) has therapeutic benefits, and numerous recently published meta-analyses (MAs) and commentaries have highlighted new evidence on the role of IAHA therapy for knee OA. A diverse, multidisciplinary group of specialists met independently in closed sessions to review findings from eight MAs with literature search end dates no earlier than 2012 to address controversies surrounding IAHA therapy for mild-to-moderate knee OA within the Canadian treatment context. Outcomes from a total of eight MAs were reviewed, and consistent and statistically significant improvements in pain, function and stiffness up to 26 weeks were found with IAHA therapy compared with IA placebo or controls, regardless of MA size or trial quality. These findings are in line with those of a Cochrane review, another recent systematic review and patient satisfaction survey. Overall, three MAs reported outcomes based on molecular weight (MW), with the two reporting effect sizes showing significantly improved pain outcomes for higher compared with lower MW HAs. Recent evidence suggests that HA therapy is well tolerated with no increased risk of serious adverse events compared with placebo and the full therapeutic effect of IAHA therapy appears to have considerable clinical importance, consisting of the combined IA placebo and HA therapeutic effects. IAHA therapy is a well-tolerated and effective option for patients with mild-to-moderate knee OA failing first-line pharmacological therapy.
骨关节炎(OA)是一种以关节软骨丧失为特征的慢性疾病,是加拿大残疾的主要原因,估计每年花费1950亿加元。膝骨关节炎会导致持续疼痛和功能丧失,治疗目标主要集中在缓解症状和保留功能。关节内透明质酸(IAHA)具有治疗益处,最近发表的众多荟萃分析(MAs)和评论强调了IAHA治疗膝骨关节炎作用的新证据。一个多元化的多学科专家小组独立召开闭门会议,审查了八项荟萃分析的结果,这些分析的文献检索截止日期不早于2012年,以解决加拿大治疗背景下围绕IAHA治疗轻至中度膝骨关节炎的争议。总共审查了八项荟萃分析的结果,发现与IA安慰剂或对照组相比,IAHA治疗在长达26周的时间里,疼痛、功能和僵硬程度有一致且具有统计学意义的改善,无论荟萃分析的规模或试验质量如何。这些发现与Cochrane综述、另一项近期的系统综述和患者满意度调查的结果一致。总体而言,三项荟萃分析报告了基于分子量(MW)的结果,其中两项报告效应量的分析显示,与低分子量HA相比,高分子量HA的疼痛结果有显著改善。最近的证据表明,与安慰剂相比,HA治疗耐受性良好,严重不良事件风险没有增加,IAHA治疗的全部治疗效果似乎具有相当大的临床重要性,包括IA安慰剂和HA的联合治疗效果。对于一线药物治疗失败的轻至中度膝骨关节炎患者,IAHA治疗是一种耐受性良好且有效的选择。