Brasiliano Paolo, Pavei Gaspare, Bergamini Elena
Department of Motor, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", 00135 Roma, Italy.
Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, 20133 Milano, Italy.
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Feb 18;25(4):1233. doi: 10.3390/s25041233.
Movement smoothness is a critical metric for evaluating motor control and sensorimotor impairments, with increasing relevance in neurorehabilitation and everyday functional assessments. This study investigates the correlation between two smoothness metrics (Log Dimensionless Jerk): LDLJV, derived from body center of mass (BCoM) trajectories using a gold-standard stereophotogrammetric system, and LDLJA, calculated from acceleration data recorded via an inertial measurement unit (IMU) placed at the L1-L2 level. Ten healthy adults (six men and four women; height: 1.71 ± 0.08 m; body mass: 68.2 ± 10.2 kg; age: 34.5 ± 8.5 years) walked on a treadmill at seven different speeds, with stride-specific data analyzed to compute smoothness indices for three anatomical components (antero-posterior, medio-lateral, cranio-caudal). Concordance between the metrics was evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis, Spearman's correlation, and the mean absolute percentage error. The results revealed weak correlations and substantial biases across all components and speeds, reflecting inherent differences between IMU- and BCoM-derived data. Correcting biases improved alignment but did not eliminate discrepancies. The findings highlight that LDLJA captures only localized trunk accelerations, whereas BCoM-derived LDLJV approximates whole-body dynamics, making direct substitution infeasible. This study emphasizes the need for careful interpretation of IMU-based metrics and contributes to refining their application in real-world gait analyses.
运动平滑度是评估运动控制和感觉运动障碍的关键指标,在神经康复和日常功能评估中的相关性日益增加。本研究调查了两种平滑度指标(对数无量纲急动度)之间的相关性:LDLJV,使用金标准立体摄影测量系统从身体质心(BCoM)轨迹得出;以及LDLJA,根据放置在L1-L2水平的惯性测量单元(IMU)记录的加速度数据计算得出。十名健康成年人(六名男性和四名女性;身高:1.71±0.08米;体重:68.2±10.2千克;年龄:34.5±8.5岁)在跑步机上以七种不同速度行走,分析特定步幅的数据以计算三个解剖成分(前后、中外侧、头尾)的平滑度指数。使用布兰德-奥特曼分析、斯皮尔曼相关性和平均绝对百分比误差评估指标之间的一致性。结果显示,在所有成分和速度下均存在弱相关性和显著偏差,反映了IMU数据和BCoM数据之间的固有差异。校正偏差改善了对齐,但并未消除差异。研究结果表明,LDLJA仅捕捉局部躯干加速度,而BCoM得出的LDLJV近似于全身动态,因此直接替代不可行。本研究强调了对基于IMU的指标进行仔细解读的必要性,并有助于完善其在实际步态分析中的应用。