Suppr超能文献

基于方案的最佳实践与亚洲患者的心源性休克生存率

Protocol-Driven Best Practices and Cardiogenic Shock Survival in Asian Patients.

作者信息

Leung Calvin, Fong Yan Hang, Chiang Michael Chi Shing, Wong Ivan Man Ho, Ho Cheuk Bong, Yeung Yin Kei, Leung Chung Yin, Lee Pok Him, So Tai Chung, Cheng Yuet Wong, Chui Shing Fung, Chan Alan Ka Chun, Wong Chi Yuen, Chan Kam Tim, O'Neill William W, Lee Michael Kang Yin

机构信息

Division of Cardiology Queen Elizabeth Hospital Hong Kong SAR.

Center for Structural Heart Disease Henry Ford Hospital Detroit MI USA.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Mar 4;14(5):e037742. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.037742. Epub 2025 Feb 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cardiogenic shock carries high mortality. This study investigated the relationship between protocol-advocated best practices and outcomes.

METHODS

Patients with cardiogenic shock supported by Impella CP in an Asian tertiary cardiac center were evaluated for 30-day post percutaneous ventricular assist device (PVAD) survival after adopting a standardized protocol emphasizing early mechanical circulatory support (shock-to-PVAD time ≤180 minutes), pulmonary artery catheterization for invasive hemodynamics, and safe vascular access.

RESULTS

Of 109 consecutive patients (mean age 58.5±11.2, 80.7% male, 67% acute myocardial infarction, 33% acute decompensated heart failure), 45 (41.3%), 33 (30.3%), and 31 (28.4%) were in SCAI Shock Stages C, D, and E, respectively. A suggestive trend of improving 30-day survival was observed (56.8%, 63.9%, and 72.2% in successive one thirds, P1, P2, and P3 of patients), paralleling a similar trend in achievement of best practices. Patients achieving all 3 best practices significantly increased from 35.1% (P1) to 52.8% (P3) (=0.026). Median shock-to-PVAD time reduced from 5 [interquartile range: 2-23] hours (P1) to 1.5 [1-5] hours (P3) ( for trend=0.014), whereas pulmonary artery catheterization utilization (80.6-86.1%) and device-related major vascular complications (5.6-8.4%) remained relatively stable. Achieving more best practices was significantly associated with better 30-day survival, with patients achieving all 3, 2, and ≤1 best practices had 30-day survival rates of 75.0%, 63.6%, and 35.7%, respectively (=0.043). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, shock-to-PVAD time >180 minutes remained an independent predictor of mortality (=0.031).

CONCLUSIONS

Achievement of protocol-advocated best practices, especially early shock recognition and prompt PVAD support in appropriate patients, was associated with improved outcomes with PVAD use in cardiogenic shock. Future studies are suggested to confirm the benefits of a protocolized approach and evaluate the value of individual best practices.

摘要

背景

心源性休克死亡率高。本研究调查了方案倡导的最佳实践与预后之间的关系。

方法

在一家亚洲三级心脏中心,对采用标准化方案(强调早期机械循环支持(休克至心室辅助装置时间≤180分钟)、用于有创血流动力学监测的肺动脉导管插入术以及安全的血管通路)后,接受Impella CP支持的心源性休克患者进行经皮心室辅助装置(PVAD)置入后30天生存率评估。

结果

109例连续患者(平均年龄58.5±11.2岁,男性占80.7%,急性心肌梗死占67%,急性失代偿性心力衰竭占33%)中,分别有45例(41.3%)、33例(30.3%)和31例(28.4%)处于SCAI休克分期C、D和E期。观察到30天生存率有改善的提示性趋势(连续三分之一患者中分别为56.8%、63.9%和72.2%,P1、P2和P3),与最佳实践的达成趋势相似。实现所有三项最佳实践的患者比例从35.1%(P1)显著增加到52.8%(P3)(=0.026)。休克至PVAD时间中位数从5[四分位间距:2 - 23]小时(P1)降至1.5[1 - 5]小时(P3)(趋势检验P = 0.014),而肺动脉导管插入术的使用率(80.6 - 86.1%)和与装置相关的主要血管并发症发生率(5.6 - 8.4%)保持相对稳定。实现更多最佳实践与更好的30天生存率显著相关,实现所有三项、两项和≤一项最佳实践的患者30天生存率分别为75.0%、63.6%和35.7%(=0.043)。在多变量Cox回归分析中,休克至PVAD时间>180分钟仍然是死亡率的独立预测因素(=0.031)。

结论

实现方案倡导的最佳实践,尤其是早期休克识别并在合适患者中及时给予PVAD支持,与心源性休克患者使用PVAD后预后改善相关。建议未来研究证实规范化方法的益处并评估个体最佳实践的价值。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验