Voruz François, Feng Sharon J, Breil Eugénie, Yu Michelle, Hammer Daniella R, Aksit Aykut, Zandkarimi Fereshteh, Olson Elizabeth S, Kysar Jeffrey W, Lalwani Anil K
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Columbia University, New York City, USA.
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, New York-Presbyterian / Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York City, USA.
Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2025 Feb 26. doi: 10.1007/s13346-025-01821-z.
Intracochlear injection through the round window membrane (RWM) has been proposed to overcome imprecise drug delivery into the inner ear. Using a novel ultrasharp microneedle, we compared the perilymphatic dexamethasone (DEX) concentration achieved after intratympanic vs. intracochlear injection at two different time points and assessed its safety in guinea pigs. For this purpose, DEX sodium phosphate (10 mg/mL) was administered either in the right middle ear space via continuous intratympanic injection or in the right scala tympani of the cochlea with microneedle-mediated injection (1 µL at 1 µL/min) across the RWM. Both groups were evaluated at 1-hour or 3-hour time points. Perilymph from both cochleae was sampled for liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, and bilateral cochleae were harvested for immunofluorescence. Eighteen guinea pigs were included. The mean DEX concentration was higher in the intracochlear delivery group than in the intratympanic delivery group at 1-hour time point (mean difference 67,863 ng/mL, 95% CI (8,352-127,374 ng/mL), p = 0.03). No difference was found at 3-hour time point. In every animal on both cochleae, no disruption in hair and supportive cells of the organ of Corti and utricle was observed. Significant middle ear inflammation was observed with the intratympanic delivery method compared to intracochlear. In conclusion, microneedle-mediated intracochlear injection achieves higher perilymphatic DEX concentration than the intratympanic route by a factor of 7 while preserving the cochlear architecture and inducing significantly less middle ear inflammation. In this new era of inner ear therapeutics, the potential for translational application is tangible and promising.
有人提出通过圆窗膜(RWM)进行鼓室内注射,以克服内耳药物递送不精确的问题。我们使用一种新型超锋利微针,比较了在两个不同时间点鼓室内注射与鼓室内注射后获得的外淋巴地塞米松(DEX)浓度,并评估了其在豚鼠中的安全性。为此,通过连续鼓室内注射将磷酸地塞米松钠(10mg/mL)施用于右中耳腔,或通过微针介导的注射(以1μL/min的速度注射1μL)穿过RWM施用于耳蜗的右鼓阶。两组均在1小时或3小时时间点进行评估。从两个耳蜗采集外淋巴用于液相色谱 - 质谱分析,并采集双侧耳蜗用于免疫荧光分析。纳入了18只豚鼠。在1小时时间点,鼓室内给药组的平均DEX浓度高于鼓室内给药组(平均差异67,863 ng/mL,95%CI(8,352 - 127,374 ng/mL),p = 0.03)。在3小时时间点未发现差异。在每只动物的两个耳蜗中,均未观察到柯蒂氏器和椭圆囊的毛细胞和支持细胞受到破坏。与鼓室内给药相比,鼓室内给药方法观察到明显的中耳炎症。总之,微针介导的鼓室内注射获得的外淋巴DEX浓度比鼓室内途径高7倍,同时保留了耳蜗结构并显著减少了中耳炎症。在内耳治疗的新时代,转化应用的潜力是切实可行且前景广阔的。