Suppr超能文献

新冠疫情对早期职业研究人员的职业和个人影响差异

Differential Professional and Personal Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Early Career Researchers.

作者信息

Alejandro Lucy O, Kowalczyk Monica, Ham Sandra A, Press Valerie G, Wolfson Rachel K, Arora Vineet M, Volerman Anna

出版信息

Acad Med. 2025 Sep 1;100(9):1080-1089. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000006005. Epub 2025 Feb 26.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Early career researchers (ECRs) are crucial to scientific advancement, but ECRs, particularly those from underrepresented groups, face unique challenges as they establish careers. Given the disruptions of the COVID-19 pandemic, this study aimed to identify the pandemic's professional and personal impacts on ECRs.

METHOD

This national cross-sectional survey study assessed the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic among ECRs by gender, sexual orientation, race, and ethnicity. Between September and December 2021, the authors invited the 4,440 ECRs with National Institutes of Health training awards in 2020 to complete an online survey with measures assessing career, personal life, and demographics.

RESULTS

Of 4,440 eligible ECRs, 1,524 (34.3%) completed the survey and 1,458 (32.8%) met inclusion criteria. Most respondents reported negative impacts to in-person conference cancellations (1,355 [93.1%]), research productivity (K award, 1,148 [87.4%]; overall, 1,192 [81.8%]), career trajectory (891 [61.2%]), and mental health (1,189 [88.1%]). Respondents with childcare responsibilities commonly reported negative impacts (801 [80.1%]). On average, respondents reporting negative impacts identified with more underrepresented groups than those reporting nonnegative impacts for certain measures, such as research productivity (K award, 0.92 vs 0.73, P < .001; overall, 0.92 vs 0.79, P = .01) and mental health (0.92 vs 0.81, P = .03). In free responses, respondents expressed stress as they balanced overwhelming demands of emerging careers and personal lives. Despite setbacks, many respondents cited new opportunities, including new projects (1,156 [79.3%]), new collaborators (926 [63.5%]), and increased flexibility (894 [61.3%]).

CONCLUSIONS

The pandemic had significant, largely negative, and unequal impacts on ECRs. Underrepresented ECRs were particularly susceptible to pandemic disruptions, potentially exacerbating existing challenges. Individual- and organizational-level interventions are critical to rejuvenate and sustain the early career research pathway. These interventions will foster the success of the next generation of biomedical scientists and the future of scientific advancement.

摘要

目的

早期职业研究人员(ECRs)对科学进步至关重要,但ECRs,尤其是那些来自代表性不足群体的研究人员,在建立职业生涯时面临着独特的挑战。鉴于新冠疫情的干扰,本研究旨在确定疫情对ECRs在职业和个人方面的影响。

方法

这项全国性横断面调查研究按性别、性取向、种族和民族评估了新冠疫情对ECRs的影响。在2021年9月至12月期间,作者邀请了2020年获得美国国立卫生研究院培训奖的4440名ECRs完成一项在线调查,该调查包含评估职业、个人生活和人口统计学的指标。

结果

在4440名符合条件的ECRs中,1524名(34.3%)完成了调查,1458名(32.8%)符合纳入标准。大多数受访者报告称,面对面会议取消(1355名[93.1%])、研究生产力(K奖获得者,1148名[87.4%];总体而言,1192名[81.8%])、职业轨迹(891名[61.2%])和心理健康(1189名[88.1%])受到了负面影响。有育儿责任的受访者普遍报告受到了负面影响(801名[80.1%])。平均而言,报告有负面影响的受访者在某些指标上,如研究生产力(K奖,0.92对0.73,P <.001;总体而言,0.92对0.79,P =.01)和心理健康(0.92对0.81,P =.03),比报告无负面影响的受访者更常属于代表性不足群体。在自由回答中,受访者表示在平衡新兴新兴平衡新兴职业和个人生活的巨大需求时感到压力。尽管遇到挫折,但许多受访者提到了新的机会,包括新项目(1156名[79.3%])、新合作者(926名[63.5%])和更高的灵活性(894名[61.3%])。

结论

疫情对ECRs产生了重大、主要为负面且不平等的影响。代表性不足的ECRs尤其容易受到疫情干扰,这可能会加剧现有的挑战。个人层面和组织层面的干预对于振兴和维持早期职业研究途径至关重要。这些干预将促进下一代生物医学科学家的成功以及科学进步的未来。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验