Suppr超能文献

危机期间对早期职业研究人员的机构支持:以新冠疫情为例的案例研究

Institutional Supports for Early Career Researchers During Crises: COVID-19 Pandemic Case Study.

作者信息

Alejandro Lucy O, Temprano Erika, Kowalczyk Monica, Wolfson Rachel K, Press Valerie G, Arora Vineet M, Volerman Anna

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Department of Pediatrics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

J Healthc Leadersh. 2025 Aug 29;17:417-430. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S533632. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To understand how institutions can support faculty during crises in biomedical research, this study examined early career researchers (ECRs) experiences with institutional supports during the COVID-19 pandemic and their perspectives on how institutions can support professional recovery.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

This national, cross-sectional study evaluated professional and personal-related institutional supports offered to ECRs during the COVID-19 pandemic, the impact of these supports, and additional supports needed for professional recovery. An online survey was distributed electronically in fall 2021 to all individuals with F32 or K-level awards through the National Institutes of Health in 2020. Descriptive statistics, chi square tests, and thematic analysis summarized findings.

RESULTS

Among 4,440 ECRs contacted, 1,587 ECRs (35.7%) responded to the survey, and 1,527 (34.4%) met inclusion criteria. Most respondents reported their institutions offered programs or services during the COVID-19 pandemic (81.3%, n=1241), including professional support(s) (76.8%, n=1172) and personal support(s) (43.6%, n=666). The most impactful support was mentoring programs, with 49.9% (n=402/806) reporting that it had positive impact, followed by personal assistants (48.4%, n=60/123) and bridge funding (for research: 42.4%, n=156/358; for salary: 41.7%, n=115/276). For coaching programs, bridge funding for salary, and elder care services, respondents indicated significant differences in the impact between expanded or new supports versus continued existing supports. Regarding institutional supports needed to support professional recovery, responses fell into six themes: caregiving support, mental health support, financial support, work support, career development support, and employment support.

CONCLUSION

This study provides novel insights into ECRs' perspectives on the supports offered by institutions during the COVID-19 pandemic and additional areas of need for professional recovery. Institutions must invest in relevant, effective, and accessible supports for ECRs to help them persist in scientific careers, particularly during periods of disruption and uncertainty.

摘要

目的

为了解机构如何在生物医学研究危机期间支持教员,本研究调查了早期职业研究人员(ECR)在新冠疫情期间获得机构支持的经历,以及他们对机构如何支持职业恢复的看法。

对象与方法

这项全国性横断面研究评估了在新冠疫情期间提供给ECR的与职业和个人相关的机构支持、这些支持的影响,以及职业恢复所需的额外支持。2021年秋季,通过电子邮件向2020年通过美国国立卫生研究院获得F32或K级别资助的所有人员发放了在线调查问卷。描述性统计、卡方检验和主题分析总结了研究结果。

结果

在联系的4440名ECR中,1587名ECR(35.7%)回复了调查问卷,1527名(34.4%)符合纳入标准。大多数受访者表示,他们的机构在新冠疫情期间提供了项目或服务(81.3%,n = 1241),包括职业支持(76.8%,n = 1172)和个人支持(43.6%,n = 666)。最有影响力的支持是指导项目,49.9%(n = 402/806)的受访者表示其有积极影响,其次是个人助理(48.4%,n = 60/123)和过渡性资助(用于研究:42.4%,n = 156/358;用于薪资:41.7%,n = 115/276)。对于辅导项目、薪资过渡性资助和老年护理服务,受访者指出扩大或新增支持与持续现有支持之间在影响上存在显著差异。关于支持职业恢复所需的机构支持,回复分为六个主题:护理支持、心理健康支持、财务支持、工作支持、职业发展支持和就业支持。

结论

本研究为ECR对新冠疫情期间机构提供的支持以及职业恢复的其他需求领域的看法提供了新的见解。机构必须为ECR投入相关、有效且可获得的支持,以帮助他们坚持科学事业,尤其是在动荡和不确定时期。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验