Suppr超能文献

双重负担:一线姑息化疗开始时晚期软组织肉瘤患者的经济毒性:来自HOLISTIC研究的基线数据

Double burden: financial toxicity in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma at the start of first-line palliative chemotherapy: baseline data from the HOLISTIC study.

作者信息

Roets E, Younger E, Jones R L, Hollander D den, Desar I M E, Young R J, Oosten A W, de Haan J J, Gelderblom H, Steeghs N, van der Graaf W T A, Husson O

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Sarcoma Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2025 Feb 27;33(3):228. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09248-5.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The HOLISTIC study assessed health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) patients receiving first-line palliative chemotherapy. The secondary objective discussed here is to evaluate baseline self-reported financial difficulties and associated sociodemographic factors and global health status (GHS), compare financial toxicity between patients in the United Kingdom (UK) and the Netherlands (NL), and evaluate the consequences of financial toxicity.

METHODS

This prospective study included 72 UK and 65 NL patients. Financial toxicity was evaluated by the financial difficulties scale of the EORTC QLQ-C30. Associated factors (i.e., country, gender, educational level, relationship status, employment changes, income, age, time since diagnosis, and GHS) were analyzed using descriptive analysis, Chi-square tests, and univariate and multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

Median participant age was 62 (range: 27-79) years, and gender distribution was equal. 58% of UK and 48% of NL patients had no income or a monthly income ≤ £/€ 2000 (p = 0.417). Self-reported additional costs for medication (31% vs. 9%, p < 0.001) and parking (75% vs. 41%, p < 0.001) were more prevalent among Dutch than UK patients. Travel expenses were similar: 68% in NL and 66% in UK. Univariate analysis showed an increased risk of financial toxicity in UK patients (40% vs. 22% [NL], p = 0.023), single patients (52% vs. 27% [with partner], p = 0.014), and those with a change in employment status (46% vs. 24% [no change], p = 0.019). In UK patients, multivariate analysis indicated lower odds for financial toxicity for patients with a high income (OR 0.207, p = 0.031) and higher odds for patients with a worse GHS (OR 5.171, p = 0.012), whereas in NL, higher odds were seen for male (OR 13.286, p = 0.027) and single (OR 41.735, p = 0.007) patients.

CONCLUSION

Financial toxicity was common among advanced STS already at the start of palliative chemotherapy, influenced by factors such as residence country, income, relationship status, gender, and GHS. Timely interventions are needed to address financial challenges in this population.

摘要

目的

“整体健康研究”评估了接受一线姑息化疗的晚期软组织肉瘤(STS)患者的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)。此处讨论的次要目标是评估基线时自我报告的经济困难及相关社会人口学因素和总体健康状况(GHS),比较英国(UK)和荷兰(NL)患者的经济毒性,并评估经济毒性的后果。

方法

这项前瞻性研究纳入了72名英国患者和65名荷兰患者。通过欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心生活质量问卷(EORTC QLQ-C30)的经济困难量表评估经济毒性。使用描述性分析、卡方检验以及单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析相关因素(即国家、性别、教育水平、婚姻状况、就业变化、收入、年龄、确诊时间和GHS)。

结果

参与者的中位年龄为62岁(范围:27 - 79岁),性别分布均衡。58%的英国患者和48%的荷兰患者没有收入或月收入≤2000英镑/欧元(p = 0.417)。自我报告的药物额外费用(31%对9%,p < 0.001)和停车费用(75%对41%,p < 0.001)在荷兰患者中比英国患者更普遍。差旅费相似:荷兰为68%,英国为66%。单因素分析显示英国患者(40%对22%[荷兰],p = 0.023)、单身患者(52%对27%[有伴侣],p = 0.014)以及就业状况有变化的患者(46%对24%[无变化],p = 0.019)出现经济毒性的风险增加。在英国患者中,多因素分析表明高收入患者出现经济毒性的几率较低(比值比[OR]0.207,p = 0.031),而GHS较差的患者几率较高(OR 5.171,p = 0.012);而在荷兰,男性(OR 13.286,p = 0.027)和单身患者(OR 41.735,p = 0.007)出现经济毒性的几率较高。

结论

在姑息化疗开始时,经济毒性在晚期STS患者中很常见,受居住国家、收入、婚姻状况、性别和GHS等因素影响。需要及时采取干预措施来应对这一人群的经济挑战。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fc1/11865148/2d3957f7761f/520_2025_9248_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验