Alves Fernandes Anna L, Mendes Andrade Lilian, Valencise Magri Laís, Mazzi-Chaves Jardel F, Rodrigues Sergio, Hallak Regalo Isabela, de Vasconcelos Paulo B, Siéssere Selma, Hallak Regalo Simone C, Palinkas Marcelo
Departamento de Biologia Básica e Oral, Faculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Brasil.
Departamento de Odontologia Restauradora, Faculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo (SP) Brasil.
Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2024 Dec;37(3):246-255. doi: 10.54589/aol.37/3/246.
Facial asymmetries, often subtle, can indicate imbalances that go beyond aesthetic concerns.
This cross-sectional study analyzed molar bite force, occlusal contact distribution, and masseter and temporal muscle thickness in adult women with facial symmetry and slight non-pathological facial asymmetry, which generally goes unnoticed and is often considered a variation of normality.
Forty-two women aged 18 to 30 were evaluated for slight non-pathological facial asymmetry using the VECTRA M3. Two groups were established: facial symmetry (n=21) and slight non-pathological facial asymmetry (n=21). Molar bite force was measured with a dynamometer. T-Scan was used to evaluate occlusal contact distribution. Masseter and temporal muscles thickness was assessed using ultrasound. Analyses used a 5% significance level (Student's t-test).
No significant difference was found in maximum molar bite force between the groups, though the slight asymmetry group showed lower force in clinical observation. No significant difference was observed in masseter and temporal muscle thickness during rest and maximum voluntary contraction, but clinically, the masseter was thicker than the temporal in both groups, being thicker in the slight non-pathological facial asymmetry group than in the facial symmetry group. Occlusal contact distribution did not differ significantly between groups, but clinically, the slight non-pathological facial asymmetry group showed less distribution in the occlusal contacts of the first permanent molars and more pronounced distribution in the left hemiarch compared to facial symmetry group.
Although no significant difference was observed between groups in this study, the numerical analysis of the results highlights the importance of evaluating the stomatognathic system in dental procedures, particularly with regard to non-pathological facial asymmetry.
面部不对称,通常较为细微,可能表明存在超出美学范畴的失衡情况。
本横断面研究分析了面部对称和轻微非病理性面部不对称的成年女性的磨牙咬合力、咬合接触分布以及咬肌和颞肌厚度,这种轻微的面部不对称通常不易被察觉,且常被视为正常变异。
使用VECTRA M3对42名年龄在18至30岁的女性进行轻微非病理性面部不对称评估。分为两组:面部对称组(n = 21)和轻微非病理性面部不对称组(n = 21)。使用测力计测量磨牙咬合力。采用T-Scan评估咬合接触分布。使用超声评估咬肌和颞肌厚度。分析采用5%的显著性水平(Student's t检验)。
两组之间最大磨牙咬合力无显著差异,尽管在临床观察中轻微不对称组的咬合力较低。在静息和最大自主收缩时,咬肌和颞肌厚度无显著差异,但在临床上,两组咬肌均比颞肌厚,且轻微非病理性面部不对称组比面部对称组更厚。两组之间咬合接触分布无显著差异,但在临床上,与面部对称组相比,轻微非病理性面部不对称组第一恒磨牙的咬合接触分布较少,而在左半牙弓的分布更为明显。
尽管本研究中两组之间未观察到显著差异,但结果的数值分析突出了在牙科手术中评估口颌系统的重要性,特别是对于非病理性面部不对称的情况。