Ji Yang, Ma Jinfeng, Ma Linshan, Xu Wendi, Ji Yahui, Wang Lisha, Feng Yanfang, Feng Zhaozhong
Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Carbon Source and Sink, China Meteorological Administration (ECSS-CMA), Jiangsu Provincial University Key Laboratory of Agricultural and Ecological Meteorology, School of Ecology and Applied Meteorology, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China.
Key Laboratory of Agro-Environment in Downstream of Yangtze Plain, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing, 210014, China.
J Environ Manage. 2025 Mar;377:124695. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124695. Epub 2025 Feb 28.
Through a paddy soil column experiment, we comprehensively evaluated the effects of three irrigation practices and three nitrogen (N) fertilizer application strategies on NH volatilization, NO emissions, and rice yields during the rice growing season to identify the optimal irrigation and fertilization combination technique to reduce both NH and NO losses in paddy soil while sustaining rice yield. In addition, we integrated molecular biology techniques (Quantitative PCR) to establish correlations between environmental factors and the abundance of N cycling-related soil microbial functional genes, revealing the intricate interactions between NH volatilization and NO emissions under varied coupling irrigation and fertilization schemes. Our results clearly showed a trade-off relationship between NO and NH emissions under water-saving irrigation practices (controlled irrigation (CI) and intermittent irrigation (II)) coupling with traditional fertilizer urea. Compared with continuous flooding (CF) practice, both CI and II treatments reduced NH volatilization by 36.3-73.9%, while increasing NO emissions by 1483.2-2246.2% during the rice growing season. Notably, the combination application of CRF under CI mode (CI-CRF) significantly reduced NH volatilization by 65.0% during the rice growing season, compared to the conventional II-Urea approach. Although the impact on NO emissions was modest, CI-CRF strategy still achieved a 4.6% reduction in NO emissions, thus tackling the trade-offs between two important environmentally damaging gases under water-saving irrigation. The suppression of NH volatilization was primarily attributed to the CI-CRF strategy lowering NH-N concentrations in flooding water, while the reduction in NO emissions was associated with an increase in soil nirS and nosZ gene abundances. Further estimates indicated that the CI-CRF strategy could potentially reduce NH volatilization by 259.2 Gg N yr and NO emissions by 3.1 Gg N yr in single-crop paddy field in China, compared with traditional II-Urea approach. Therefore, the optimal reduction of gaseous N loss, coupled with yield enhancement, could be achieved through the synergistic strategy of CI-CRF in single-crop rice cultivation ecosystems. Future studies should focus on field-based experiments that explore the long-term effects of CI-CRF combinations under varying soil types, climates, and rice cultivation systems.
通过水稻土柱试验,我们全面评估了三种灌溉方式和三种氮肥施用策略对水稻生长季氨挥发、氧化亚氮排放及水稻产量的影响,以确定在维持水稻产量的同时减少稻田土壤氨和氧化亚氮损失的最佳灌溉与施肥组合技术。此外,我们整合分子生物学技术(定量PCR)来建立环境因素与氮循环相关土壤微生物功能基因丰度之间的关联,揭示不同耦合灌溉和施肥方案下氨挥发与氧化亚氮排放之间的复杂相互作用。我们的结果清楚地表明,在节水灌溉方式(控制灌溉(CI)和间歇灌溉(II))与传统肥料尿素耦合的情况下,氧化亚氮和氨排放之间存在权衡关系。与淹灌(CF)方式相比,CI和II处理在水稻生长季均使氨挥发减少了36.3%-73.9%,同时氧化亚氮排放增加了1483.2%-2246.2%。值得注意的是,与传统的II-尿素方法相比,CI模式下控释肥(CRF)的组合施用在水稻生长季显著降低了65.0%的氨挥发。尽管对氧化亚氮排放的影响较小,但CI-CRF策略仍使氧化亚氮排放减少了4.6%,从而解决了节水灌溉下两种重要环境有害气体之间的权衡问题。氨挥发的抑制主要归因于CI-CRF策略降低了淹灌水的氨氮浓度,而氧化亚氮排放的减少与土壤nirS和nosZ基因丰度的增加有关。进一步估计表明,与传统的II-尿素方法相比,CI-CRF策略在中国单季稻田中可能每年减少259.2Gg氮的氨挥发和3.1Gg氮的氧化亚氮排放。因此,在单季水稻种植生态系统中,通过CI-CRF的协同策略可以实现气态氮损失的最佳减少以及产量的提高。未来的研究应侧重于基于田间的试验,探索不同土壤类型、气候和水稻种植系统下CI-CRF组合的长期影响。