Suppr超能文献

使用就诊原因分类法进行国际现场试验的结果。

Results of the international field trial with the Reason for Encounter Classification.

作者信息

Lamberts H, Meads S, Wood M

出版信息

Soz Praventivmed. 1985;30(2):80-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02083050.

Abstract

The Reason for Encounter Classification (RFEC) was designed by a WHO Working Party to classify the reasons why patients seek care at the primary care level. It is designed along two axes: Chapters and Components. Each chapter carries an alpha-code which is the first character of the basic 3-character alphanumeric code. Each chapter is subdivided into seven "components" carrying 2-digit numeric codes. The field trial was undertaken by family physicians and nurses in: Australia, Barbados, Brazil, Hungary, Malaysia, the Netherlands, Norway and the US. 90497 RFE's were analysed. Their distribution over the chapters and components characterize the content of international primary care. Listings with the most common RFE's in the participating countries reflect the cultural differences. It is concluded that the RFEC is not only feasible to classify reasons why patients seek care but also to classify the diagnosis and the process of primary care. As a result of this, the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC) succeeds the RFEC.

摘要

就诊原因分类法(RFEC)由世界卫生组织一个工作小组设计,用于对患者在基层医疗层面寻求治疗的原因进行分类。它沿着两个轴设计:章节和组成部分。每个章节都有一个字母代码,是基本三位字符字母数字代码的第一个字符。每个章节又细分为七个“组成部分”,带有两位数字代码。该现场试验由澳大利亚、巴巴多斯、巴西、匈牙利、马来西亚、荷兰、挪威和美国的家庭医生和护士进行。分析了90497条就诊原因。它们在各章节和组成部分中的分布体现了国际基层医疗的内容。参与国最常见就诊原因的列表反映了文化差异。得出的结论是,就诊原因分类法不仅可行于对患者寻求治疗的原因进行分类,也可行于对基层医疗的诊断和过程进行分类。因此,国际基层医疗分类法(ICPC)取代了就诊原因分类法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验