• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于人群的个体系统招募可确保较高的肺癌筛查参与率。

Population-based systematic enrolment of individuals ensures high lung cancer screening uptake.

作者信息

Laisaar Tanel, Kallavus Kadi, Poola Anneli, Räppo Mari, Taur Merily, Makke Vahur, Frik Marianna, Ilves Pilvi, Laisaar Kaja-Triin

机构信息

Lung Clinic, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia; Institute of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia; Lung Clinic, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.

Institute of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia; Lung Clinic, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.

出版信息

Cancer Treat Res Commun. 2025;43:100889. doi: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2025.100889. Epub 2025 Feb 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.ctarc.2025.100889
PMID:40031097
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Lung cancer screening (LCS) is recommended by international societies, yet it is still debated how to efficiently enrol participants. The aim of this study was to evaluate systematic enrolment of patients through family physicians in a regional LCS pilot study in Estonia.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study was conducted in one county (with approximately 10 % of the country's population), where all family physicians were approached. In each participating practice, all 55- to 74-year-old individuals were identified and evaluated by the family physician or nurse. Two LCS inclusion criteria were used in parallel - individuals with elevated lung cancer (LC) risk, according to either smoking status (≥20 pack-years; quit <15 years ago) and/or a PLCO risk score (>1.5 %/6 years), underwent low-dose computed tomography (LDCT). The scans were evaluated and participants managed according to LungRADS 1.1 protocol.

RESULTS

Seventy-four participating family physician practices had 26 759 patients in the target age group. During the inclusion period 24 413 individuals were evaluated, of whom 17 215 were excluded. Of the remaining 7198 individuals, 3708 had higher LC risk and were referred for LDCT. Of the 3444 individuals who underwent LDCT, 30 were diagnosed with LC. Considering the total LCS target age group, an estimated participation rate of 79.3 % (95 %CI 78.1 %-80.5 %) was achieved.

CONCLUSION

Population-based systematic enrolment of participants for LCS by family physicians and nurses ensured very high uptake in the target group, providing a valuable reference for planning LCS programs in countries with family physicians on board.

摘要

引言

国际社会推荐进行肺癌筛查(LCS),但如何有效招募参与者仍存在争议。本研究的目的是在爱沙尼亚的一项区域性LCS试点研究中,评估通过家庭医生对患者进行系统招募的情况。

材料与方法

本研究在一个县(约占该国人口的10%)进行,所有家庭医生均参与其中。在每个参与的诊所中,家庭医生或护士对所有55至74岁的个体进行识别和评估。同时使用了两个LCS纳入标准——根据吸烟状况(≥20包年;戒烟时间<15年前)和/或PLCO风险评分(>1.5%/6年),确定肺癌(LC)风险升高的个体,接受低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)。根据LungRADS 1.1协议对扫描结果进行评估并对参与者进行管理。

结果

74个参与的家庭医生诊所在目标年龄组中有26759名患者。在纳入期间,对24413名个体进行了评估,其中17215名被排除。在其余的7198名个体中,3708名有较高的LC风险,并被转诊进行LDCT检查。在接受LDCT检查的3444名个体中,有30名被诊断为LC。考虑到整个LCS目标年龄组,估计参与率达到了79.3%(95%CI 78.1%-80.5%)。

结论

由家庭医生和护士对参与者进行基于人群的系统招募,确保了目标群体的高参与率,为有家庭医生参与的国家规划LCS项目提供了有价值的参考。

相似文献

1
Population-based systematic enrolment of individuals ensures high lung cancer screening uptake.基于人群的个体系统招募可确保较高的肺癌筛查参与率。
Cancer Treat Res Commun. 2025;43:100889. doi: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2025.100889. Epub 2025 Feb 26.
2
National lung cancer screening program feasibility study in Estonia.爱沙尼亚全国肺癌筛查项目可行性研究
Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2023 Jun 1;36(6). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivad041.
3
A 16-year evaluation of opportunistic lung cancer screening with low-dose CT in China: comparative findings between non-smokers and smokers.中国低剂量 CT 肺癌筛查的 16 年评估:非吸烟者和吸烟者的比较结果。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Oct 28;24(1):1322. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-13056-1.
4
Lung Cancer Screening Before and After a Multifaceted Electronic Health Record Intervention: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.多方位电子健康记录干预措施前后的肺癌筛查:一项非随机对照试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2415383. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.15383.
5
Lung Cancer Screening in Family Members and Peers of Patients With Lung Cancer: Protocol for a Prospective Cohort Study.肺癌患者家庭成员和同伴的肺癌筛查:一项前瞻性队列研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Mar 28;14:e58529. doi: 10.2196/58529.
6
Patient Navigation for Lung Cancer Screening at a Health Care for the Homeless Program: A Randomized Clinical Trial.卫生保健服务无家可归者计划中的肺癌筛查患者导航:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2024 Aug 1;184(8):892-902. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.1662.
7
The UK Lung Cancer Screening Trial: a pilot randomised controlled trial of low-dose computed tomography screening for the early detection of lung cancer.英国肺癌筛查试验:一项关于低剂量计算机断层扫描筛查早期肺癌的试点随机对照试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2016 May;20(40):1-146. doi: 10.3310/hta20400.
8
Real-World Lung Cancer CT Screening Performance, Smoking Behavior, and Adherence to Recommendations: Lung-RADS Category and Smoking Status Predict Adherence.真实世界肺癌CT筛查表现、吸烟行为及对建议的依从性:Lung-RADS分类和吸烟状况可预测依从性。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Apr;216(4):919-926. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.23637. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
9
Lung Cancer Screening in the US, 2022.2022 年美国肺癌筛查
JAMA Intern Med. 2024 Aug 1;184(8):882-891. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.1655.
10
The effect of direct referral for fast CT scan in early lung cancer detection in general practice. A clinical, cluster-randomised trial.在全科医疗中,直接转诊进行快速CT扫描对早期肺癌检测的效果。一项临床、整群随机试验。
Dan Med J. 2015 Mar;62(3).

引用本文的文献

1
The Lithuanian Lung Cancer Screening Model: Results of a Pilot Study.立陶宛肺癌筛查模型:一项试点研究的结果。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jun 12;17(12):1956. doi: 10.3390/cancers17121956.