Wakabayashi Takuya, Miyata Takeshi, Ogura Takenori, Agawa Yuji, Nakazawa Yusuke, Shiraishi Wataru, Chihara Hideo, Umemura Takeru, Nakajima Hiroaki, Tomoyose Ryuta, Tsujimoto Yoshitaka, Hatano Taketo
Department of Neurosurgery, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Department of Neurosurgery, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2025 Mar;250:108804. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2025.108804. Epub 2025 Feb 26.
Acute unilateral vertebral artery occlusion (VAO) with a patent basilar artery (BA) often results in neurological deterioration due to brainstem infarction from occluded VA perforators, despite comprehensive medical treatment. While recent studies show mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is effective for BA occlusion as well as anterior circulation occlusions, its role in acute unilateral VAO with patent BA remains unclear. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of MT for acute unilateral VAO with patent BA in patients presenting mild symptoms.
We retrospectively reviewed cases of acute VAO with patent BA treated at our institution from April 2016 to March 2023. Patients were assigned to two groups: the MT Group (undergoing MT for unilateral VAO) and the Control Group (receiving medical treatment, including intravenous tissue-plasminogen activator). Clinical and radiological outcomes were compared between groups to evaluate procedural feasibility and safety.
Five cases (four males, one female) were included, with a median age of 71 years (IQR: 56-80) and a median NIHSS score of 6 at admission (IQR: 3-11). Three patients underwent MT, and two received conservative treatment. In the MT Group, two patients with successful recanalization experienced no complications or brainstem infarction. One patient with unsuccessful recanalization and both Control Group patients showed early neurological deterioration from brainstem infarction.
Acute unilateral VAO with patent BA frequently exacerbates symptoms due to brainstem perforator occlusion, worsening prognosis. Successful VA recanalization may prevent symptomatic brainstem infarction, potentially improving outcomes. Larger prospective studies are warranted.
急性单侧椎动脉闭塞(VAO)且基底动脉(BA)通畅时,尽管进行了全面的药物治疗,但由于闭塞的椎动脉穿支导致脑干梗死,常导致神经功能恶化。虽然最近的研究表明机械取栓术(MT)对基底动脉闭塞以及前循环闭塞有效,但其在急性单侧VAO且BA通畅中的作用仍不清楚。本研究旨在评估MT对症状较轻的急性单侧VAO且BA通畅患者的有效性。
我们回顾性分析了2016年4月至2023年3月在我院接受治疗的急性VAO且BA通畅的病例。患者分为两组:MT组(接受单侧VAO的MT治疗)和对照组(接受包括静脉注射组织纤溶酶原激活剂在内的药物治疗)。比较两组的临床和影像学结果,以评估手术的可行性和安全性。
纳入5例患者(4例男性,1例女性),中位年龄71岁(四分位间距:56 - 80岁),入院时美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)中位评分为6分(四分位间距:3 - 11分)。3例患者接受了MT治疗,2例接受了保守治疗。在MT组中,2例再通成功的患者未出现并发症或脑干梗死。1例再通失败的患者和对照组的2例患者均出现了因脑干梗死导致的早期神经功能恶化。
急性单侧VAO且BA通畅常因脑干穿支闭塞而使症状加重,预后恶化。椎动脉成功再通可能预防有症状的脑干梗死,有可能改善预后。需要进行更大规模的前瞻性研究。