Gathani Toral, Dhaliwal Bep, Lwiindi Julliet, Dawson Shoba
Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 3;15(3):e091888. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091888.
There is evidence that those who typically contribute to patient and public involvement (PPI) activities do not reflect the diversity of the population, and individuals from underserved groups are less likely to participate in healthcare research. For some researchers, understanding how to embed diversity into their PPI work can be confusing and challenging. The aim of this communication article is to reflect on our experiences and share the lessons learnt from developing an ethnically diverse PPI group to co-deliver breast cancer research.
Researchers must be realistic about timelines at both the grant application stage and during the research project, as finding contributors for inclusive and diverse PPI work takes time. Researchers will benefit from utilisation of existing expertise and resources within existing PPI teams at research institutions. It is vitally important to be clear about what researchers need in terms of contributors and what the PPI activities will be at different stages of the research project.
Conducting effective, diverse and meaningful PPI is a research skill that needs to be learnt and practised just like any other. Well-developed inclusive PPI has significant benefits for both researchers and the public.
有证据表明,那些通常参与患者和公众参与(PPI)活动的人并不能反映出人群的多样性,来自服务不足群体的个人参与医疗保健研究的可能性较小。对于一些研究人员来说,理解如何将多样性融入他们的PPI工作可能会令人困惑且具有挑战性。这篇交流文章的目的是反思我们的经验,并分享从组建一个种族多元化的PPI小组共同开展乳腺癌研究中学到的经验教训。
研究人员在 grant 申请阶段和研究项目期间都必须对时间安排保持现实态度,因为寻找包容性和多元化PPI工作的贡献者需要时间。研究人员将受益于利用研究机构现有PPI团队中的现有专业知识和资源。明确研究人员在贡献者方面的需求以及研究项目不同阶段的PPI活动是什么至关重要。
开展有效、多样且有意义的PPI是一项需要像其他技能一样学习和实践的研究技能。精心发展的包容性PPI对研究人员和公众都有显著益处。