Falcão Luciano, Cerqueira Gabriel Araújo, Gonçalves João Pedro Fernandes, de Andrade João Felipe Tenisi, de Azevedo Figueiredo Trocoli Caio Passos, Medrado-Nunes Gabriel Souza, Santos Vanessa Emanuelle Cunha, Pustilnik Hugo Nunes, Fontes Jefferson Heber Marques, Dos Passos George Santos
Bahiana School of Medicine and Public Health, Av. Dom João VI, 275 - Brotas, Salvador, BA, 40290-000, Brazil.
Bahia Federal University, Bahia, Brazil.
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Mar 4;48(1):281. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03428-x.
Recurrence after resection is a major factor in poor prognosis for grade 2 and 3 gliomas. The effect of Supratotal Resection (STR) on recurrence timing remains debated. This meta-analysis examines overall survival (OS) and tumor progression in grade 2 and 3 gliomas after supratotal resection.
Studies on patients with grade II and III gliomas who underwent supratotal resection were included, with comparisons to subtotal, partial, and total resections. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and tumor progression, while secondary outcomes included return-to-work (RTW) rates, malignant transformations and cognitive impairments.
We included 954 patients from 8 studies, mean age was 39 (± 16) years. The mean OS for patients undergoing supratotal resection was 17.45 (95% CI: 3.39 to 89.74, p < 0.05) compared to TR. The OR for RTW in the STR group versus TR group was 0.12 (95% CI: 0.01 to 1.28, p = 0.08). Tumor progression OR was, no statistical significantly, 0.15 (95% CI: 0.00 to 38.00, p = 0.5), and the likelihood of malignancy was reduced 0.03 (95% CI: 0.01 to 0.18, p < 0.01) compared to the TR group. In the immediate pos-operatory, when comparing STR with TR, the OR of language impairment was 5.47 (95% CI: 2.73 to 10.97, p < 0.01) and cognitive impairment was 0.38 (95% CI: 0.17 to 0.58). During the follow-up, the OR of language impairment was 0.68 (95% CI: 0.25 to 1.81, p = 0.44) and cognitive impairment was 0.34 (95% CI: 0.03 to 3.61, p = 0.37) comparing STR with TR.
Patients with grade 2 and 3 gliomas undergoing supratotal resection showed significantly higher overall survival, fewer malignant transformations and language impairments in immediate pos-operatory. While there was a trend towards higher return-to-work rates, progression of tumor and better cognitive status during the follow-up, it was not statistically significant. Further studies are needed for definitive conclusions.
Not applicable.
切除术后复发是2级和3级胶质瘤预后不良的主要因素。超全切除(STR)对复发时间的影响仍存在争议。本荟萃分析探讨2级和3级胶质瘤超全切除术后的总生存期(OS)和肿瘤进展情况。
纳入接受超全切除的II级和III级胶质瘤患者的研究,并与次全切除、部分切除和全切除进行比较。主要结局为总生存期(OS)和肿瘤进展,次要结局包括重返工作岗位(RTW)率、恶性转化和认知障碍。
我们纳入了8项研究中的954例患者,平均年龄为39(±16)岁。与全切除相比,接受超全切除患者的平均总生存期为17.45(95%CI:3.39至89.74,p<0.05)。STR组与全切除组相比,RTW的OR为0.12(95%CI:0.01至1.28,p=0.08)。肿瘤进展的OR无统计学意义,为0.15(95%CI:0.00至38.00,p=0.5),与全切除组相比,恶性转化的可能性降低了0.03(95%CI:0.01至0.18,p<0.01)。在术后即刻,将STR与全切除进行比较时,语言障碍的OR为5.47(95%CI:2.73至10.97,p<0.01),认知障碍的OR为0.38(95%CI:0.17至0.58)。在随访期间,将STR与全切除进行比较时,语言障碍的OR为0.68(95%CI:0.25至1.81,p=0.44),认知障碍的OR为0.34(95%CI:0.03至3.61,p=0.37)。
接受超全切除的2级和3级胶质瘤患者显示出显著更高的总生存期、更少的恶性转化以及术后即刻更少的语言障碍。虽然随访期间有更高的重返工作岗位率、肿瘤进展和更好的认知状态的趋势,但无统计学意义。需要进一步研究得出明确结论。
不适用。