Suppr超能文献

次全切除对2级和3级胶质瘤患者总生存期及肿瘤进展的影响:一项系统评价和Meta分析

Influence of supratotal resection on overall survival and progression of tumor in gliomas grade 2 and 3: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Falcão Luciano, Cerqueira Gabriel Araújo, Gonçalves João Pedro Fernandes, de Andrade João Felipe Tenisi, de Azevedo Figueiredo Trocoli Caio Passos, Medrado-Nunes Gabriel Souza, Santos Vanessa Emanuelle Cunha, Pustilnik Hugo Nunes, Fontes Jefferson Heber Marques, Dos Passos George Santos

机构信息

Bahiana School of Medicine and Public Health, Av. Dom João VI, 275 - Brotas, Salvador, BA, 40290-000, Brazil.

Bahia Federal University, Bahia, Brazil.

出版信息

Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Mar 4;48(1):281. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03428-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recurrence after resection is a major factor in poor prognosis for grade 2 and 3 gliomas. The effect of Supratotal Resection (STR) on recurrence timing remains debated. This meta-analysis examines overall survival (OS) and tumor progression in grade 2 and 3 gliomas after supratotal resection.

METHODS

Studies on patients with grade II and III gliomas who underwent supratotal resection were included, with comparisons to subtotal, partial, and total resections. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and tumor progression, while secondary outcomes included return-to-work (RTW) rates, malignant transformations and cognitive impairments.

RESULTS

We included 954 patients from 8 studies, mean age was 39 (± 16) years. The mean OS for patients undergoing supratotal resection was 17.45 (95% CI: 3.39 to 89.74, p < 0.05) compared to TR. The OR for RTW in the STR group versus TR group was 0.12 (95% CI: 0.01 to 1.28, p = 0.08). Tumor progression OR was, no statistical significantly, 0.15 (95% CI: 0.00 to 38.00, p = 0.5), and the likelihood of malignancy was reduced 0.03 (95% CI: 0.01 to 0.18, p < 0.01) compared to the TR group. In the immediate pos-operatory, when comparing STR with TR, the OR of language impairment was 5.47 (95% CI: 2.73 to 10.97, p < 0.01) and cognitive impairment was 0.38 (95% CI: 0.17 to 0.58). During the follow-up, the OR of language impairment was 0.68 (95% CI: 0.25 to 1.81, p = 0.44) and cognitive impairment was 0.34 (95% CI: 0.03 to 3.61, p = 0.37) comparing STR with TR.

CONCLUSION

Patients with grade 2 and 3 gliomas undergoing supratotal resection showed significantly higher overall survival, fewer malignant transformations and language impairments in immediate pos-operatory. While there was a trend towards higher return-to-work rates, progression of tumor and better cognitive status during the follow-up, it was not statistically significant. Further studies are needed for definitive conclusions.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

Not applicable.

摘要

背景

切除术后复发是2级和3级胶质瘤预后不良的主要因素。超全切除(STR)对复发时间的影响仍存在争议。本荟萃分析探讨2级和3级胶质瘤超全切除术后的总生存期(OS)和肿瘤进展情况。

方法

纳入接受超全切除的II级和III级胶质瘤患者的研究,并与次全切除、部分切除和全切除进行比较。主要结局为总生存期(OS)和肿瘤进展,次要结局包括重返工作岗位(RTW)率、恶性转化和认知障碍。

结果

我们纳入了8项研究中的954例患者,平均年龄为39(±16)岁。与全切除相比,接受超全切除患者的平均总生存期为17.45(95%CI:3.39至89.74,p<0.05)。STR组与全切除组相比,RTW的OR为0.12(95%CI:0.01至1.28,p=0.08)。肿瘤进展的OR无统计学意义,为0.15(95%CI:0.00至38.00,p=0.5),与全切除组相比,恶性转化的可能性降低了0.03(95%CI:0.01至0.18,p<0.01)。在术后即刻,将STR与全切除进行比较时,语言障碍的OR为5.47(95%CI:2.73至10.97,p<0.01),认知障碍的OR为0.38(95%CI:0.17至0.58)。在随访期间,将STR与全切除进行比较时,语言障碍的OR为0.68(95%CI:0.25至1.81,p=0.44),认知障碍的OR为0.34(95%CI:0.03至3.61,p=0.37)。

结论

接受超全切除的2级和3级胶质瘤患者显示出显著更高的总生存期、更少的恶性转化以及术后即刻更少的语言障碍。虽然随访期间有更高的重返工作岗位率、肿瘤进展和更好的认知状态的趋势,但无统计学意义。需要进一步研究得出明确结论。

临床试验编号

不适用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验