Vena Antonio, Mezzogori Laura, Castaldo Nadia, Corcione Silvia, Pascale Renato, Giannella Maddalena, Pinna Simone Mornese, Giacobbe Daniele Roberto, Bavaro Davide Fiore, Scaglione Vincenzo, Fumarola Benedetta, Pagani Gabriele, De Rosa Francesco Giuseppe, Bartoletti Michele, Bassetti Matteo
Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Infectious Disease Unit, IRCCS San Martino Polyclinic Hospital, Genoa, Italy.
Infect Dis Ther. 2025 Mar;14(3):657-669. doi: 10.1007/s40121-025-01117-2. Epub 2025 Mar 4.
The treatment of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bloodstream infections (BSI) remains challenging due to the organism's intrinsic multidrug resistance and the potential side effects of commonly used first-line antibiotics.
Here, we describe four cases of S. maltophilia BSI treated with cefiderocol (≥ 72 h) in different Italian hospitals. Additionally, we conducted a PubMed search to identify other studies reporting cases of S. maltophilia BSI managed with cefiderocol.
We reviewed a total of 8 cases of S. maltophilia BSI [median age 52.5 years (Q1-Q3 27.5-61.0), 50% males] treated with cefiderocol, including ours. BSI sources were mainly central venous catheters (62.5%) and the lower respiratory tract (25.0%). Cefiderocol was used as first-line therapy in 87.5% of patients (7/8), with a median treatment duration of 14 days (IQR 6.2-16.0). Combination therapy was administered in 62.5% of cases. Infection source control was required in 75.0% and achieved in 40.0%. Clinical success was observed in 62.5% of patients, with microbiological eradication in 87.5%. In-hospital mortality occurred in 37.5% of cases, with one death directly attributable to S. maltophilia. No significant differences were observed in terms of outcomes between cefiderocol monotherapy and combination therapy.
Based on our findings and a review of the literature, cefiderocol-based regimens show promise as an effective treatment option for S. maltophilia BSI, warranting further investigation in larger studies.
嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌血流感染(BSI)的治疗仍然具有挑战性,这是由于该菌固有的多重耐药性以及常用一线抗生素的潜在副作用。
在此,我们描述了在意大利不同医院用头孢地尔(≥72小时)治疗的4例嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌BSI病例。此外,我们进行了PubMed检索,以确定其他报告用头孢地尔治疗嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌BSI病例的研究。
我们共回顾了包括我们的病例在内的8例用头孢地尔治疗的嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌BSI病例[中位年龄52.5岁(四分位间距27.5 - 61.0),50%为男性]。BSI的来源主要是中心静脉导管(62.5%)和下呼吸道(25.0%)。87.5%的患者(7/8)将头孢地尔用作一线治疗,中位治疗持续时间为14天(四分位间距6.2 - 16.0)。62.5%的病例采用了联合治疗。75.0%的病例需要控制感染源,其中40.0%得以实现。62.5%的患者观察到临床成功,87.5%实现了微生物清除。37.5%的病例发生了院内死亡,1例死亡直接归因于嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌。头孢地尔单药治疗和联合治疗在结局方面未观察到显著差异。
基于我们的研究结果和文献回顾,以头孢地尔为基础的治疗方案有望成为治疗嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌BSI的有效选择,值得在更大规模的研究中进一步探究。