Xia Jiajie, Tu Chuanjian, Qian Hui, Gu Zhiwei, Song Dagang, Xu Lei
From the Department of Neurosurgery, The Central Affiliated Hospital, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, China.
Neurologist. 2025 Mar 1;30(2):87-92. doi: 10.1097/NRL.0000000000000592.
Identification of acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO) etiology is crucial for effective revascularization therapy. As collaterals are pivotal in maintaining cerebral perfusion in intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS), we investigated whether multiphase CT angiography (mCTA) collateral score can be a diagnosis marker of ICAS-related LVO.
We reviewed clinical and imaging data from 92 patients who presented with AIS-LVO and underwent mCTA (57 ICAS-related LVO and 35 embolic LVO). Logistic regression was used to identify ICAS-related LVO. The diagnostic accuracy of the mCTA collateral score for identifying ICAS-related LVO was determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
Compared with patients with embolic LVO, those with ICAS-related LVO had a high median mCTA collateral score (4 vs. 3; P<0.0001). The multinomial logistic regression analysis revealed a significant increase in the mCTA collateral score (OR: 3.717, 95% CI: 2.009-6.876, P<0.0001) in patients with ICAS-related LVO. ROC analysis revealed that the optimal cutoff point of the mCTA collateral score to diagnosis the ICAS-related LVO was 3.5, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.817 (95% CI: 0.736-0.899; P<0.0001), sensitivity was 80.7%, and specificity was 74.3%. Further analysis revealed that patients with a 4 to 5 mCTA collateral score exhibited a significantly higher median modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at discharge compared with those with a 0 to 3 score (P=0.0464).
The mCTA collateral score may be associated with ICAS-related LVO and could be beneficial in identifying the etiology of AIS-LVO.
明确急性缺血性卒中伴大血管闭塞(AIS-LVO)的病因对于有效的血管再通治疗至关重要。由于侧支循环在颅内动脉粥样硬化性狭窄(ICAS)中对维持脑灌注起关键作用,我们研究了多期CT血管造影(mCTA)侧支循环评分是否可作为ICAS相关LVO的诊断标志物。
我们回顾了92例AIS-LVO患者的临床和影像资料,这些患者均接受了mCTA检查(57例为ICAS相关LVO,35例为栓塞性LVO)。采用逻辑回归分析来确定ICAS相关LVO。使用受试者操作特征(ROC)分析来确定mCTA侧支循环评分对识别ICAS相关LVO的诊断准确性。
与栓塞性LVO患者相比,ICAS相关LVO患者的mCTA侧支循环评分中位数较高(4比3;P<0.0001)。多项逻辑回归分析显示,ICAS相关LVO患者的mCTA侧支循环评分显著升高(比值比:3.717,95%置信区间:2.009 - 6.876,P<0.0001)。ROC分析显示,mCTA侧支循环评分诊断ICAS相关LVO的最佳截断点为3.5,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.817(95%置信区间:0.736 - 0.899;P<0.0001),敏感性为80.7%,特异性为74.3%。进一步分析显示,mCTA侧支循环评分为4至5分的患者出院时改良Rankin量表(mRS)中位数显著高于评分为0至3分的患者(P = 0.0464)。
mCTA侧支循环评分可能与ICAS相关LVO有关,有助于识别AIS-LVO的病因。