Lin Yan-Hong, Lin Jin, Xu Jia-Yun, Lai Bing-Xin, He Min-Hao, Zhu Ying-Ru, Pang Ya-Li, Dong Li, Li Jun-Hao, Zhao Sheng-Sheng, Lin Yu-Zhi, Li Rui-Zhong, Yao Hai-Yan, Liang Dao-Chen
Department of Orthopedics, Zhongshan City People's Hospital, Zhongshan, PR China.
First School of Clinical Medicine, Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, PR China.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Feb 26;483(8):1528-39. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003430.
Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) has been extensively treated clinically using percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA), which includes percutaneous kyphoplasty and percutaneous vertebroplasty. Postoperative refracture is a common complication after PVA, but the associated factors and specific mechanisms behind these fractures are not entirely clear.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: In a systematic review and meta-analysis, we asked: What factors were associated with increased or decreased odds of refracture after PVA for OVCF?
Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive search of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase for the time period from database inception to August 31, 2024 (which also was when we last searched). We included case-control studies in which participants were patients with OVCF and were treated with PVA, grouped into refracture versus non-refracture groups based on the presence or absence of refracture. We excluded studies published on preprint servers, conference reports, case reports, and systematic reviews or meta-analyses. We collected 2398 records in the database. After excluding studies that were duplicates and did not meet the inclusion criteria, we included 22 studies involving 7132 participants, 75% (5368) of whom were women, with a mean age of 76 years for patients in the refracture group and 74 years for patients in the non-refracture group. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, with which we assessed three aspects of the study; the mean ± SD score for the included studies was 7.3 ± 0.7 of 9 total (on this scale, higher scores are better), representing generally high study quality. The determination of heterogeneity relied on I2 and chi-square test, and we used a random-effects model when the I2 was > 50% and p ≤ 0.05; otherwise, a fixed-effects model was chosen. According to the Egger test and trim and fill method, publication bias did not significantly affect most of our results.
The combined results showed that older age (mean difference 2.24 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25 to 3.23]; p < 0.001), lower bone mineral density (BMD) (standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.72 [95% CI -0.99 to -0.45]; p < 0.001), greater preoperative AP vertebral height ratio (SMD 0.26 [95% CI 0.07 to 0.45]; p = 0.01), greater preoperative kyphotic angle (KA) (SMD 0.47 [95% CI 0.10 to 0.83]; p = 0.01), bone cement leakage (OR 1.39 [95% CI 1.05 to 1.84]; p = 0.02), multivertebral fractures (OR 3.58 [95% CI 2.53 to 5.07]; p < 0.001), smoking (OR 1.53 [95% CI 1.16 to 2.02]; p = 0.003), use of glucocorticoids (OR 3.18 [95% CI 2.09 to 4.84]; p < 0.001), and previous osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OR 2.55 [95% CI 1.58 to 4.13]; p < 0.001) were associated with increased odds of refractures after surgery. Use of antiosteoporosis therapy was associated with a decreased odds of postoperative refracture (OR 0.39 [95% CI 0.24 to 0.64]; p < 0.001).
Based on the results of our meta-analysis, surgeons can identify those who are more likely to have refracture by knowing basic information about their patients preoperatively, such as advanced age, lower BMD, greater preoperative AP ratio, greater preoperative KA, and the presence of multivertebral fractures or previous osteoporotic vertebral fracture. Also, intraoperative reduction of bone cement leakage and postoperative counseling of patients to quit smoking, reduce glucocorticoid use, and administration of antiosteoporosis therapy were used to reduce the probability of refracture. The association between some factors and refracture is uncertain, such as BMI and thoracolumbar fracture, and further studies are needed.
Level III, therapeutic study.
骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(OVCF)在临床上已广泛采用经皮椎体强化术(PVA)进行治疗,其中包括经皮椎体后凸成形术和经皮椎体成形术。术后再骨折是PVA术后常见的并发症,但这些骨折背后的相关因素和具体机制尚不完全清楚。
问题/目的:在一项系统评价和荟萃分析中,我们提出以下问题:哪些因素与OVCF患者PVA术后再骨折几率的增加或降低相关?
按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)报告指南,我们对Cochrane图书馆、PubMed、科学网和Embase进行了全面检索,检索时间段为各数据库建库至2024年8月31日(这也是我们最后一次检索的时间)。我们纳入了病例对照研究,研究对象为接受PVA治疗的OVCF患者,根据是否发生再骨折分为再骨折组和非再骨折组。我们排除了发表在预印本服务器、会议报告、病例报告以及系统评价或荟萃分析上的研究。我们在数据库中收集了2398条记录。在排除重复研究和不符合纳入标准的研究后,我们纳入了22项研究,涉及7132名参与者,其中75%(5368名)为女性,再骨折组患者的平均年龄为76岁,非再骨折组患者的平均年龄为74岁。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行质量评估,我们从三个方面评估研究;纳入研究的平均±标准差得分为9分制中的7.3±0.7分(在此量表上,分数越高越好),表明研究质量总体较高。异质性的判定依赖于I²和卡方检验,当I²>50%且p≤0.05时,我们使用随机效应模型;否则,选择固定效应模型。根据Egger检验和修剪填充法,发表偏倚对我们的大多数结果没有显著影响。
综合结果显示,年龄较大(平均差值2.24[95%置信区间(CI)1.25至3.23];p<0.001)、骨密度(BMD)较低(标准化平均差值[SMD]-0.72[95%CI-0.99至-0.45];p<0.001)、术前椎体前后径高度比更大(SMD 0.26[95%CI 0.07至0.45];p=0.01)、术前后凸角(KA)更大(SMD 0.47[95%CI 0.10至0.83];p=0.01)、骨水泥渗漏(比值比[OR]1.39[95%CI 1.05至1.84];p=0.02)、多节段骨折(OR 3.58[95%CI 2.53至5.07];p<0.001)、吸烟(OR 1.53[95%CI 1.16至2.02];p=0.003)、使用糖皮质激素(OR 3.18[95%CI 2.09至4.84];p<0.001)以及既往骨质疏松性椎体骨折(OR 2.55[95%CI 1.58至4.13];p<0.001)与术后再骨折几率增加相关。使用抗骨质疏松治疗与术后再骨折几率降低相关(OR 0.39[95%CI 0.24至0.64];p<0.001)。
基于我们的荟萃分析结果,外科医生可以通过术前了解患者的基本信息,如高龄、低BMD、术前更大的椎体前后径比、术前更大的KA以及存在多节段骨折或既往骨质疏松性椎体骨折,来识别那些更有可能发生再骨折的患者。此外,术中减少骨水泥渗漏以及术后指导患者戒烟、减少糖皮质激素使用并给予抗骨质疏松治疗,以降低再骨折的概率。一些因素与再骨折之间的关联尚不确定,如体重指数(BMI)和胸腰椎骨折,需要进一步研究。
III级,治疗性研究。