Urrutia Tomas, Faundez Jorge, Vidal Catalina, Palma Joaquín, Filippi Jorge
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Foot Ankle Surg. 2025 Aug;31(6):539-546. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2025.02.009. Epub 2025 Feb 26.
Pilon fractures, constituting 3-10 % of all tibia fractures, present significant challenges due to their complex nature and frequent involvement of soft tissue damage. Effective management necessitates careful preoperative planning and strategic surgical approach selection. This study aims to provide a comprehensive cadaveric analysis comparing eight distinct surgical approaches to tibial pilon fractures, focusing on the consistently exposed segment and the extent of the exposed bone area for each approach.
Sixteen foot and ankle specimens, obtained through our university's body donation program, were utilized for this study. Each specimen underwent two different approaches, resulting in four repetitions for each assessed method. The approaches analyzed included anteromedial, anterolateral, lateral, posterolateral, posteromedial, posterior modified posteromedial, anterior modified posteromedial, and medial approaches. Standardized incisions and retraction techniques were employed to measure the exposed bone area using ImageJ software, while the consistently exposed segment was determined through axial cuts and photographic analysis.
The anteromedial approach yielded the largest exposed area (18.36 cm²), whereas the anterolateral approach provided the greatest exposed segment (72°). The posteromedial approach proved most effective for exposing the Volkmann fragment, and the anterolateral approach was optimal for accessing the Chaput fragment and comminution areas. Combining the posteromedial and posterior modified posteromedial approaches could be suggested for extensive posterior malleolus fractures to maximize bone surface exposure while minimizing soft tissue damage.
This study offers objective data on the exposed area and segment for various surgical approaches, providing a valuable resource for orthopedic surgeons in preoperative planning and decision-making. By enhancing the understanding of the capabilities and limitations of each approach, this research aims to improve surgical outcomes for patients with complex tibial pilon fractures.
Pilon骨折占所有胫骨骨折的3%-10%,因其性质复杂且常伴有软组织损伤,带来了重大挑战。有效的治疗需要仔细的术前规划和战略手术入路选择。本研究旨在提供一项全面的尸体分析,比较治疗胫骨Pilon骨折的八种不同手术入路,重点关注每种入路持续暴露的节段以及暴露骨面积的范围。
通过我校人体捐赠项目获得的16个足踝标本用于本研究。每个标本采用两种不同的入路,每种评估方法重复四次。分析的入路包括前内侧、前外侧、外侧、后外侧、后内侧、改良后内侧、改良前内侧和内侧入路。采用标准化切口和牵开技术,使用ImageJ软件测量暴露骨面积,同时通过轴向切割和摄影分析确定持续暴露的节段。
前内侧入路暴露面积最大(18.36平方厘米),而前外侧入路暴露节段最大(72°)。后内侧入路在暴露Volkmann骨折块方面最为有效,前外侧入路在显露Chaput骨折块和粉碎区域方面最为理想。对于广泛的后踝骨折,建议联合使用后内侧和改良后内侧入路,以最大限度地暴露骨面,同时尽量减少软组织损伤。
本研究提供了各种手术入路暴露面积和节段的客观数据,为骨科医生进行术前规划和决策提供了宝贵资源。通过增强对每种入路能力和局限性的理解,本研究旨在改善复杂胫骨Pilon骨折患者的手术效果。