Suppr超能文献

妊娠24周前进行指征性宫颈环扎术预防早产的效果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

The effect of an exam-indicated cerclage before 24 weeks of gestation to prevent preterm birth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Koullali Bouchra, van Dijk Charlotte E, Kleinrouweler Charlotte E, Limpens Jacqueline C E J M P, Mol Ben W, Oudijk Martijn A, Pajkrt Eva

机构信息

Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam 1105 AZ, the Netherlands.

Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam 11005 AZ, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2025 Feb 11;25:100372. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2025.100372. eCollection 2025 Mar.

Abstract

The effect of an exam-indicated cerclage (EIC) remains uncertain due to limited evidence from reviews covering pregnancies beyond this timeframe. With the 24-week mark serving as an international threshold for neonatal care initiation, the aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the available literature on the effectiveness of an EIC before 24 weeks of gestation. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, CENTRAL, clinicaltrials.gov and WHO-ICTRP were searched for randomized controlled trials, cohort and case-control studies comparing EIC with expectant management in singleton pregnancies with cervical dilation ≤ 5 cm between 14 and 24 weeks of gestation to prevent preterm birth (PTB) < 37 weeks of gestation. Secondary outcomes included obstetrical and neonatal outcomes. Quality assessment was preformed using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Analyses were conducted using R(studio) version 3.6.1. and outcomes stated as odds ratios (OR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI). Prospero: #CRD42019137400. The search yielded 787 potential studies. Four studies non-randomized (retrospective) could be included. Quality assessment showed overall good quality. The main weaknesses were retrospective designs, small sample sizes and the poor comparability of the intervention and control groups. The study population resulted in 215 women, among whom 163 (76 %) underwent cerclage placement and 52 (24 %) were expectantly managed. EIC compared with expectant management was associated with significant lower rates of PTB before 37 weeks (71.2 % vs 94.2 %; OR 0.11; 95 % CI 0.03-0.35), 34 weeks (49.1 % vs 86.5 %; OR 0.10; 95 % CI 0.03-0.31), 32 weeks (43.0 % vs 80.0 %; OR 0.13; 95 % CI 0.04-0.43), 28 weeks (43.0 % vs 75.0 %; OR 0.19; 95 % CI 0.07-0.51) and 24 weeks (23.3 % vs 50 %; OR 0.29; 95 % CI 0.13-0.65) of gestation, significant prolongation of the pregnancy (mean difference 39.14 days; 95 %CI 30.58-47.71; p-value <0.0001) and a greater gestational age at delivery (mean difference 4.91 weeks; 95 % CI 2.32-7.49; p-value 0.0002) compared to expectant management. The current literature suggests that EIC before 24 weeks of gestation is associated with improved pregnancy outcomes compared to expectant management. The results are limited by the lack of randomised trials and studied neonatal outcomes plus the potential for bias in the included studies.

摘要

由于涵盖超过该时间范围的妊娠的综述证据有限,基于检查指征的宫颈环扎术(EIC)的效果仍不确定。鉴于24周作为启动新生儿护理的国际阈值,本系统综述的目的是评估关于妊娠24周前EIC有效性的现有文献。检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE、科学网、CENTRAL、clinicaltrials.gov和WHO-ICTRP,以查找比较EIC与期待治疗在妊娠14至24周、宫颈扩张≤5cm的单胎妊娠中预防孕周<37周早产(PTB)的随机对照试验、队列研究和病例对照研究。次要结局包括产科和新生儿结局。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行质量评估。使用R(studio)3.6.1版进行分析,结局以比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)表示。国际系统评价前瞻性注册库:#CRD42019137400。检索产生了787项潜在研究。可纳入四项非随机(回顾性)研究。质量评估显示总体质量良好。主要缺点是回顾性设计、样本量小以及干预组和对照组可比性差。研究人群包括215名女性,其中163名(76%)接受了宫颈环扎术,52名(24%)接受了期待治疗。与期待治疗相比,EIC与37周前PTB发生率显著降低相关(71.2%对94.2%;OR 0.11;95%CI 0.03 - 0.35),34周时(49.1%对86.5%;OR 0.10;95%CI 0.03 - 0.31),32周时(43.0%对80.0%;OR 0.13;95%CI 0.04 -

0.43),28周时(43.0%对75.0%;OR 0.19;95%CI 0.07 - 0.51)以及24周时(23.3%对50%;OR 0.29;95%CI 0.13 - 0.65),与期待治疗相比,妊娠显著延长(平均差异39.14天;95%CI 30.58 - 47.71;p值<0.0001)且分娩时孕周更大(平均差异4.91周;95%CI 2.32 - 7.49;p值0.0002)。当前文献表明,与期待治疗相比,妊娠24周前的EIC与改善的妊娠结局相关。结果受到缺乏随机试验、所研究的新生儿结局以及纳入研究中存在偏倚可能性的限制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5b8/11876763/0b810d4d9f24/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验