Wirta David L, El-Harazi Sherif M, Tepedino Michael E, Bacharach Jason
Eye Research Foundation, Newport Beach, California.
Global Research Management, Glendale, California.
Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2025 Jul-Aug;8(4):384-392. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2025.02.004. Epub 2025 Mar 4.
Sepetaprost is a novel investigative prodrug, the active form of which is a dual agonist targeting both prostaglandin F receptors and prostaglandin E receptor 3. This study (NCT04742283) aimed to demonstrate the noninferiority of sepetaprost ophthalmic solution 0.002% to timolol maleate ophthalmic solution 0.5% in participants with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT).
A phase IIb, randomized, double-masked, active-controlled, multicenter study conducted in the United States.
In total, 323 adult (≥18 years) participants (POAG, 68.4%; OHT, 31.6%) were randomized 1:1 to receive either once-daily sepetaprost (n = 162) or twice-daily timolol (n = 161) in 1 eye for 3 months.
Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured at 3 timepoints (8:00 am, 10:00 am, and 4:00 pm) at 3 visits (weeks 2 and 6 and month 3).
The primary efficacy endpoint was noninferiority of sepetaprost to timolol. Noninferiority was established if the upper limit of the 2-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in mean IOP (sepetaprost minus timolol) was ≤1.5 mmHg at all 9 specified timepoints and ≤1.0 mmHg at 5 or more of the 9 timepoints. Superiority was tested if noninferiority was achieved. Safety, including adverse events (AEs) and suspected adverse reactions, was evaluated throughout.
The primary endpoint, the noninferiority of sepetaprost to timolol in mean IOP reductions, was met. The upper limit of the 2-sided 95% CI for the between-group difference in mean IOP score was <1.0 mmHg at all 9 timepoints. Superiority of sepetaprost to timolol was observed at 4:00 pm in week 2, week 6, and month 3; IOP mean difference (standard error): -0.76 (0.302), -0.73 (0.328), and -0.95 (0.319), respectively (all P < 0.05). Overall, 23.6% of participants receiving sepetaprost and 21.3% receiving timolol experienced AEs. The most commonly reported ocular AE in both groups was conjunctival hyperemia (sepetaprost, 9.9%; timolol, 2.5%).
Once-daily sepetaprost 0.002% was statistically noninferior to twice-daily timolol 0.5% for lowering IOP in participants with POAG or OHT. There were no unexpected safety concerns observed, and all AEs were mild or moderate in severity.
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
司贝他前列素是一种新型的研究用前体药物,其活性形式是一种双重激动剂,可同时作用于前列腺素F受体和前列腺素E受体3。本研究(NCT04742283)旨在证明0.002%司贝他前列素滴眼液相对于0.5%马来酸噻吗洛尔滴眼液在原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)或高眼压症(OHT)患者中的非劣效性。
在美国进行的一项IIb期、随机、双盲、活性对照、多中心研究。
总共323名成年(≥18岁)参与者(POAG患者占68.4%;OHT患者占31.6%),按1:1随机分配,一只眼睛每日一次使用司贝他前列素(n = 162)或每日两次使用噻吗洛尔(n = 161),持续3个月。
在3次就诊(第2周、第6周和第3个月)时的3个时间点(上午8:00、上午10:00和下午4:00)测量眼压(IOP)。
主要疗效终点是司贝他前列素相对于噻吗洛尔的非劣效性。如果在所有9个指定时间点,平均眼压差异(司贝他前列素减去噻吗洛尔)的双侧95%置信区间(CI)上限≤1.5 mmHg,且在9个时间点中的5个或更多时间点≤1.0 mmHg,则确定为非劣效性。如果达到非劣效性,则检验优效性。在整个研究过程中评估安全性,包括不良事件(AE)和疑似不良反应。
达到了主要终点,即司贝他前列素在降低平均眼压方面相对于噻吗洛尔的非劣效性。在所有9个时间点,两组平均眼压评分差异的双侧95% CI上限均<1.0 mmHg。在第2周、第6周和第3个月的下午4:00观察到司贝他前列素相对于噻吗洛尔的优效性;眼压平均差异(标准误)分别为-0.76(0.302)、-0.73(0.328)和-0.95(0.319)(均P < 0.05)。总体而言,接受司贝他前列素治疗的参与者中有23.6%发生AE,接受噻吗洛尔治疗的参与者中有21.3%发生AE。两组最常报告的眼部AE均为结膜充血(司贝他前列素组为9.9%;噻吗洛尔组为2.5%)。
对于POAG或OHT患者,每日一次使用0.002%司贝他前列素在降低眼压方面在统计学上不劣于每日两次使用0.5%噻吗洛尔。未观察到意外的安全问题,所有AE的严重程度均为轻度或中度。
在本文末尾的脚注和披露中可能会找到专有或商业披露信息。