Stangl D, Pfohl B, Zimmerman M, Bowers W, Corenthal C
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1985 Jun;42(6):591-6. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1985.01790290073008.
With few exceptions, published studies fail to indicate that the DSM-III personality disorders can be distinguished from each other with respect to etiology, prognosis, treatment response, or family history. The Structured Interview for the DSM-III Personality Disorders (SIDP) was developed to improve axis II diagnostic reliability, and hence allow validity testing of axis II. Sixty-three subjects were independently rated by two interviewers using the SIDP. The kappa coefficients for interrater agreement reached .70 or higher for histrionic, borderline, and dependent personalities. While it is impossible to separate the validity testing of the SIDP from validity testing of the DSM-III personality criteria themselves, preliminary results from 102 inpatient SIDP interviews suggest some criterion-based validity with respect to standard personality rating scales and some construct validity with respect to the dexamethasone suppression test.
除少数例外情况外,已发表的研究未能表明《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM-III)中的人格障碍在病因、预后、治疗反应或家族史方面能够相互区分。为提高轴II诊断的可靠性,进而对轴II进行效度检验,开发了《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版人格障碍结构化访谈(SIDP)。63名受试者由两名访谈者使用SIDP进行独立评分。对于表演型、边缘型和依赖型人格,评分者间一致性的kappa系数达到0.70或更高。虽然不可能将SIDP的效度检验与DSM-III人格标准本身的效度检验分开,但对102例住院患者进行SIDP访谈的初步结果表明,在标准人格评定量表方面有一些基于标准的效度,在地塞米松抑制试验方面有一些结构效度。