Suppr超能文献

边缘型人格障碍诊断标准的可靠性:《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版与边缘型患者诊断访谈的比较

Reliability of criteria for borderline personality disorder: a comparison of DSM-III and the Diagnostic Interview for Borderline Patients.

作者信息

Frances A, Clarkin J F, Gilmore M, Hurt S W, Brown R

出版信息

Am J Psychiatry. 1984 Sep;141(9):1080-4. doi: 10.1176/ajp.141.9.1080.

Abstract

The authors compared the reliability of two methods of distinguishing borderline personality disorder--DSM-III and the Diagnostic Interview for Borderline Patients. The reference group, outpatients with other personality disorders and without major axis I pathology, was more difficult to distinguish from the patients with borderline personality disorder than such groups used in previous samples. The sensitivity and specificity of the Diagnostic Interview for Borderline Patients were calculated, with DSM-III used as a criterion. The findings confirm considerable overlap between borderline and schizotypal personality disorders, more impairment in functioning in borderline patients than in those with other personality disorders, and the high reliability with which borderline personality disorder can be diagnosed.

摘要

作者比较了两种区分边缘型人格障碍的方法——《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM-III)和边缘型患者诊断访谈的可靠性。参照组为患有其他人格障碍且无主要轴I病理特征的门诊患者,相较于之前样本中使用的此类群体,该参照组更难与边缘型人格障碍患者区分开来。以DSM-III作为标准,计算了边缘型患者诊断访谈的敏感性和特异性。研究结果证实了边缘型人格障碍与分裂型人格障碍之间存在相当大的重叠,边缘型患者的功能损害比其他人格障碍患者更严重,以及边缘型人格障碍诊断具有较高的可靠性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验