Kicken M P, Deenen M J, van der Wekken A J, van den Borne B E E M, van den Heuvel M M, Ter Heine R
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Department of Pharmacy, Radboudumc, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2025 Apr;64(4):511-531. doi: 10.1007/s40262-025-01492-6. Epub 2025 Mar 5.
Precision dosing of classical cytotoxic drugs in oncology remains underdeveloped, especially in treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Despite advancements in targeted therapy and immunotherapy, classical cytotoxic agents continue to play a critical role in NSCLC treatment. However, the current body surface area (BSA)-based dosing of these agents fails to adequately address interindividual variability in pharmacokinetics. By better considering patient characteristics, treatment outcomes can be improved, reducing risks of under-exposure and over-exposure. This narrative review explores opportunities for precision dosing for key cytotoxic agents used in NSCLC treatment: cisplatin, carboplatin, pemetrexed, docetaxel, (nab-)paclitaxel, gemcitabine, and vinorelbine. A comprehensive review of regulatory reports and an extensive literature search were conducted to evaluate current dosing practices, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and exposure-response relationships. Our findings highlight promising developments in precision dosing, although the number of directly implementable strategies remains limited. The most compelling evidence supports using the biomarker cystatin C for more precise carboplatin dosing and adopting weekly dosing schedules for docetaxel, paclitaxel, and nab-paclitaxel. Additionally, we recommend direct implementation of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-guided dosing for paclitaxel. This review stresses the urgent need to reassess conventional dosing paradigms for classical cytotoxic agents to better align with the principles of the precision dosing framework. Our recommendations show the potential of precision dosing to improve NSCLC treatment, addressing gaps in the current dosing of classical cytotoxic drugs. Given the large NSCLC patient population, optimising the dosing of these agents could significantly improve treatment outcomes and reduce toxicity for many patients.
肿瘤学中经典细胞毒性药物的精准给药仍未得到充分发展,尤其是在治疗非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)方面。尽管靶向治疗和免疫治疗取得了进展,但经典细胞毒性药物在NSCLC治疗中仍继续发挥关键作用。然而,目前基于体表面积(BSA)的这些药物给药方式未能充分解决药代动力学方面的个体间差异。通过更好地考虑患者特征,可以改善治疗效果,降低暴露不足和暴露过度的风险。这篇叙述性综述探讨了NSCLC治疗中使用的关键细胞毒性药物(顺铂、卡铂、培美曲塞、多西他赛、(纳米)紫杉醇、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨)精准给药的机会。我们对监管报告进行了全面综述,并进行了广泛的文献检索,以评估当前的给药实践、药代动力学、药效学和暴露-反应关系。我们的研究结果突出了精准给药方面有前景的进展,尽管可直接实施的策略数量仍然有限。最有说服力的证据支持使用生物标志物胱抑素C进行更精准的卡铂给药,并采用多西他赛、紫杉醇和纳米紫杉醇的每周给药方案。此外,我们建议直接实施治疗药物监测(TDM)指导的紫杉醇给药。这篇综述强调迫切需要重新评估经典细胞毒性药物的传统给药模式,以更好地符合精准给药框架的原则。我们的建议显示了精准给药改善NSCLC治疗的潜力,填补了当前经典细胞毒性药物给药方面的空白。鉴于NSCLC患者数量众多,优化这些药物的给药可以显著改善许多患者的治疗效果并降低毒性。