Valachis Antonis, Karihtala Peeter, Geisler Jürgen, Tuxen Malgorzata K
Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Örebro, Sweden.
Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Centre and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Acta Oncol. 2025 Mar 5;64:349-357. doi: 10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42733.
This study aimed to assess current treatment strategies for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) and the perceptions of clinical experts in Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Finland, and Iceland, comparing them to international guidelines to provide insights into how these therapies are implemented and adapted to national Nordic guidelines.
A three-round modified Delphi method was followed with consensus defined as 70% agreement. A steering committee selected 20 experienced oncologists as panellists and developed the questionnaires. Questions included items related to treatment preferences in different treatment lines with different clinical scenarios in mTNBC patients.
In the first round, eight out of 33 questions on clinical treatment reached consensus with 14 out of 27 in the second round reaching consensus. In round three, eight out of eight questions reached consensus. The preferred treatment for mTNBC patients with PD-L1 positive was checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) in combination with chemotherapy. For patients with germline BRCA mutation and PD-L1 negative disease, PARP-inhibitors were preferred as 1L and sacituzumab govitecan (SG) in both 2L and later lines. Disagreement was observed for chemotherapy in later lines where evidence is sparse or lacking.
The high level of consensus for new treatment strategies, such as CPI and PARP-inhibitors in 1L and SG in 2L or later lines, in comparison with the limited consensus for older treatments, such as chemotherapy, may reflect the growing academic evidence for different treatment strategies. Understanding the treatment patterns across different countries contributes to gaining consensus on the upcoming therapeutic advances.
本研究旨在评估转移性三阴性乳腺癌(mTNBC)的当前治疗策略以及瑞典、丹麦、挪威、芬兰和冰岛临床专家的看法,并将其与国际指南进行比较,以深入了解这些疗法是如何实施以及如何适应北欧国家指南的。
采用三轮改良德尔菲法,将70%的一致性定义为达成共识。一个指导委员会挑选了20名经验丰富的肿瘤学家作为小组成员,并制定了问卷。问题包括与mTNBC患者不同临床场景下不同治疗线的治疗偏好相关的项目。
在第一轮中,33个关于临床治疗的问题中有8个达成了共识,第二轮27个问题中有14个达成了共识。在第三轮中,8个问题全部达成了共识。PD-L1阳性的mTNBC患者的首选治疗方法是检查点抑制剂(CPI)联合化疗。对于胚系BRCA突变且PD-L1阴性疾病的患者,PARP抑制剂在一线治疗中更受青睐,而在二线及后续治疗中,戈沙妥珠单抗(SG)更受青睐。在证据稀少或缺乏的后续治疗线中,对于化疗存在分歧。
与化疗等旧疗法的有限共识相比,新治疗策略如一线治疗中的CPI和PARP抑制剂以及二线或后续治疗中的SG达成的高度共识,可能反映了不同治疗策略的学术证据不断增加。了解不同国家的治疗模式有助于就即将到来的治疗进展达成共识。