Lobo Wendy Maria Vianney, Sayed Abrar, Sapkale Kishor, Ramugade Manoj, Benavides Ana Cristina Mejia
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Government Dental College and Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Department of Endodontics, Catholic University of Honduras, San Pedro Sula, Honduras.
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025 Feb;28(2):182-186. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_750_24. Epub 2025 Feb 3.
Separated instruments have been retrieved from root canals using different systems of instruments. However, it has been a common observation that usage of available retrieval systems may weaken the roots of teeth making them prone to fracture and subsequent failure of the treatment as a whole. Hence, the following study was conducted to evaluate and compare the resistance to vertical root fracture after retrieval of separated instruments from the root canal using Ultrasonic U Files, Ultrasonic Tip (Acteon Endo Success ET25 Retreatment Tip), or the Endo Rescue System under magnification of the dental operating microscope.
Forty-two moderately curved mesiobuccal roots of extracted decoronated mandibular first molar teeth were hemisectioned to standardize them to a length of 15 mm each. Following biomechanical preparation, 4-mm length ProTaper gold rotary finishing files F2 were intentionally separated in the middle third of the mesiobuccal root canal and verified radiographically. The samples were then randomly divided into three groups, and retrieval of the separated instrument was performed using the Ultrasonic U files, Ultrasonic ET25 Retreatment tip, or Endo Rescue System, respectively. After retrieval of the separated instruments, the samples were subjected to testing for vertical root fracture resistance using a universal testing machine with an accuracy of ± 1%. The data collected from all the samples were then subjected to statistical analysis.
Ultrasonic U files (Group A) showed the highest vertical root fracture resistance, with a statistically significant difference from the samples treated with ET 25 Ultrasonic retreatment tips(Group B). No significant differences were observed between Group A and C or Group B and Endo Rescue System (Group C) ( > 0.05).
It was observed that Ultrasonic U files offer the least reduction in the vertical root fracture resistance after removal of separated instruments followed by the Endo Rescue system and then the ultrasonic ET25 retreatment tips. While no single instrument retrieval system is universally suitable for all situations due to various factors such as root anatomy, instrument type, location, size, pulpal status, and operator skill, clinicians should determine the treatment protocol by carefully considering the tooth's future prognosis.
已使用不同的器械系统从根管中取出分离的器械。然而,常见的观察结果是,使用现有的取出系统可能会削弱牙齿的牙根,使其易于折断,并导致整个治疗随后失败。因此,进行了以下研究,以评估和比较在牙科手术显微镜放大下,使用超声U锉、超声尖(Acteon Endo Success ET25再治疗尖)或Endo Rescue系统从根管中取出分离器械后,牙根对垂直骨折的抵抗力。
将42颗拔除的下颌第一磨牙的中度弯曲近中颊根进行半切,使其标准化为每根长度15mm。在进行生物力学预备后,将4mm长的ProTaper金旋转精修锉F2有意分离于近中颊根管的中三分之一处,并进行影像学验证。然后将样本随机分为三组,分别使用超声U锉、超声ET25再治疗尖或Endo Rescue系统取出分离的器械。在取出分离的器械后,使用精度为±1%的万能试验机对样本进行垂直牙根抗折性测试。然后对从所有样本收集的数据进行统计分析。
超声U锉(A组)显示出最高的垂直牙根抗折性,与使用ET 25超声再治疗尖处理的样本(B组)相比,差异具有统计学意义。A组与C组或B组与Endo Rescue系统(C组)之间未观察到显著差异(P>0.05)。
观察到,在取出分离器械后,超声U锉对垂直牙根抗折性的降低最小,其次是Endo Rescue系统,然后是超声ET25再治疗尖。由于诸如牙根解剖结构、器械类型、位置、大小、牙髓状态和操作者技术等各种因素,没有单一的器械取出系统普遍适用于所有情况,临床医生应通过仔细考虑牙齿的未来预后来确定治疗方案。