Reumers Stacha F I, Bongaerts Fleur L P, de Leeuw Frank-Erik, van de Warrenburg Bart P C, Schutter Dennis J L G, Kessels Roy P C
Department of Neurology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Helmholtz Institute, Department of Experimental Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J Neurol. 2025 Mar 6;272(3):250. doi: 10.1007/s00415-025-12967-8.
This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to examine the profile and extent of cognitive deficits in patients with cerebellar disorders, and to provide a complete overview of the cognitive domains that might be affected in the Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome (CCAS).
MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and Web of Science were systematically searched to 17-07-2024. Studies were considered if the participants were adult patients with a clinical diagnosis of cerebellar disorder and were neuropsychological assessed. Outcomes were grouped into the domains of processing speed, language, social cognition, executive function, visuospatial skills, episodic memory, verbal intelligence, attention, and working memory. All aetiologies were included for first evaluation and patients were assigned to one of two groups (focal vs. degenerative) for secondary evaluation. Random-effects models were employed for the meta-analyses.
129 studies with a total of 3140 patients with cerebellar disorders were included. Patients performed significantly worse compared to control/standardized data in all domains. Deficits were most pronounced in processing speed, ES [95% CI] = - 0.83 [- 1.04, - 0.63], language, ES [95% CI] = - 0.81 [- 0.94, - 0.67], and social cognition, ES [95% CI] = - 0.81 [- 1.19, - 0.42]. Cognitive impairment varied between patients with focal cerebellar lesions and degenerative cerebellar disorders, but was overall worse in the degenerative group.
Cerebellar disorders can impact many cognitive domains, extending beyond executive functioning, visuospatial skills, and language. These outcomes contribute to a broader understanding of the cerebellum's role in cognition and sheds light on the cognitive deficits associated with cerebellar disorders.
本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在研究小脑疾病患者认知缺陷的特征和程度,并全面概述小脑认知情感综合征(CCAS)中可能受影响的认知领域。
系统检索了MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO和Web of Science至2024年7月17日的数据。如果参与者是临床诊断为小脑疾病的成年患者并接受了神经心理学评估,则纳入研究。结果分为加工速度、语言、社会认知、执行功能、视觉空间技能、情景记忆、言语智力、注意力和工作记忆等领域。首次评估纳入所有病因,二次评估时将患者分为两组(局灶性与退行性)。荟萃分析采用随机效应模型。
纳入129项研究,共3140例小脑疾病患者。在所有领域,患者的表现均显著差于对照/标准化数据。加工速度方面的缺陷最为明显,效应量(ES)[95%置信区间(CI)]= -0.83 [-1.04, -0.63],语言方面,ES [95% CI]= -0.81 [-0.94, -0.67],社会认知方面,ES [95% CI]= -0.81 [-1.19, -0.42]。局灶性小脑病变患者和退行性小脑疾病患者的认知障碍有所不同,但总体上退行性组更严重。
小脑疾病可影响许多认知领域,不仅限于执行功能、视觉空间技能和语言。这些结果有助于更广泛地理解小脑在认知中的作用,并揭示与小脑疾病相关的认知缺陷。