Suppr超能文献

活性物质吡唑醚菌酯农药风险评估的同行评审。

Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance pyraclostrobin.

作者信息

Álvarez Fernando, Arena Maria, Auteri Domenica, Leite Sofia Batista, Binaglia Marco, Castoldi Anna Federica, Chiusolo Arianna, Colagiorgi Angelo, Colas Mathilde, Crivellente Federica, De Lentdecker Chloe, De Magistris Isabella, Egsmose Mark, Fait Gabriella, Ferilli Franco, Broussard Monica Fittipaldi, Santonja German Giner, Gouliarmou Varvara, Halling Katrin, Ippolito Alessio, Istace Frederique, Jarrah Samira, Kardassi Dimitra, Kienzler Aude, Lanzoni Anna, Lava Roberto, Leuschner Renata, Linguadoca Alberto, Louisse Jochem, Lythgo Christopher, Magrans Oriol, Mangas Iris, Mioč Andrea, Miron Ileana, Molnar Tunde, Padovani Laura, Padricello Vincenzo, Panzarea Martina, Parra Morte Juan Manuel, Piti Alexandra, Rizzuto Simone, Romac Anamarija, Rortais Agnès, Santos Miguel, Serafimova Rositsa, Sharp Rachel, Szentes Csaba, Theobald Anne, Tiramani Manuela, Vianello Giorgia, Villamar-Bouza Laura

出版信息

EFSA J. 2025 Mar 6;23(3):e9257. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9257. eCollection 2025 Mar.

Abstract

The conclusions of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State Germany and co-rapporteur Member State Hungary for the pesticide active substance pyraclostrobin and the assessment of applications for maximum residue levels (MRLs) are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012, as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2018/1659. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of pyraclostrobin as a fungicide and plant growth regulator on cereals (wheat, barley, oats, rye, triticale), maize (forage and grain) and potatoes. MRLs were assessed in sweet corn and fish. The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment and the proposed MRLs, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are reported where identified.

摘要

报告了欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)在对报告成员国德国和共同报告成员国匈牙利的主管当局就农药活性物质吡唑醚菌酯进行的初始风险评估进行同行评审以及对最大残留限量(MRL)申请进行评估之后得出的结论。同行评审的背景是委员会实施条例(欧盟)第844/2012号(经委员会实施条例(欧盟)第2018/1659号修订)所要求的。这些结论是在评估吡唑醚菌酯作为杀菌剂和植物生长调节剂在谷物(小麦、大麦、燕麦、黑麦、小黑麦)、玉米(饲料和谷物)和马铃薯上的代表性用途的基础上得出的。对甜玉米和鱼类中的最大残留限量进行了评估。列出了适用于监管风险评估的可靠终点以及提议的最大残留限量。列出了监管框架要求的缺失信息。报告了已发现的问题。

相似文献

1
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance pyraclostrobin.
EFSA J. 2025 Mar 6;23(3):e9257. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9257. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance flutolanil.
EFSA J. 2023 Jun 7;21(6):e07997. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7997. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance picoxystrobin.
EFSA J. 2016 Jun 22;14(6):e04515. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4515. eCollection 2016 Jun.
4
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance metrafenone.
EFSA J. 2023 May 22;21(5):e08012. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8012. eCollection 2023 May.
5
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance sulfur.
EFSA J. 2023 Mar 8;21(3):e07805. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7805. eCollection 2023 Mar.
6
Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance benzovindiflupyr.
EFSA J. 2015 Mar 18;13(3):4043. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4043. eCollection 2015 Mar.
7
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance ethephon.
EFSA J. 2023 Jan 31;21(1):e07742. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7742. eCollection 2023 Jan.
8
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance triclopyr (variant triclopyr-butotyl).
EFSA J. 2024 Aug 12;22(8):e8177. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8177. eCollection 2024 Aug.
9
Updated peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance trinexapac (variant evaluated trinexapac-ethyl).
EFSA J. 2023 Jun 28;21(6):e08082. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8082. eCollection 2023 Jun.
10
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance chlorpropham.
EFSA J. 2017 Jul 26;15(7):e04903. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4903. eCollection 2017 Jul.

引用本文的文献

1
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance maltodextrin.
EFSA J. 2025 Mar 11;23(3):e9294. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9294. eCollection 2025 Mar.

本文引用的文献

2
Setting of import tolerance for pyraclostrobin in papayas.
EFSA J. 2023 Jun 12;21(6):e08056. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8056. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
Revised guidance on the risk assessment of plant protection products on bees (, spp. and solitary bees).
EFSA J. 2023 May 11;21(5):e07989. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7989. eCollection 2023 May.
5
Modification of the existing maximum residue level for pyraclostrobin in sweet corn.
EFSA J. 2019 Oct 15;17(10):e05841. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5841. eCollection 2019 Oct.
6
Guidance for the identification of endocrine disruptors in the context of Regulations (EU) No 528/2012 and (EC) No 1107/2009.
EFSA J. 2018 Jun 7;16(6):e05311. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5311. eCollection 2018 Jun.
7
Modification of the existing maximum residue levels and setting of import tolerances for pyraclostrobin in various crops.
EFSA J. 2018 Nov 19;16(11):e05488. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5488. eCollection 2018 Nov.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验