• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动物区系对栖息地干扰的响应:解释蚂蚁群落响应的原理是否也适用于陆生爬行动物?

Faunal Responses to Habitat Disturbance: Do the Principles Explaining Responses of Ant Communities Also Apply to Terrestrial Reptiles?

作者信息

Rachmansah Angga, Christian Keith, Murphy Brett P, Schlesinger Christine, Andersen Alan N

机构信息

Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods Charles Darwin University Brinkin Northern Territory Australia.

出版信息

Ecol Evol. 2025 Mar 6;15(3):e70939. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70939. eCollection 2025 Mar.

DOI:10.1002/ece3.70939
PMID:40051452
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11883185/
Abstract

Disturbance is fundamental to the state and dynamics of biological communities, and understanding biotic responses to disturbance is critical to effective biodiversity conservation. However, a predictive understanding of how faunal communities respond to habitat disturbance remains elusive. Recently, a conceptual framework centred on habitat openness was developed for understanding ant responses to disturbance. It proposes that habitat openness is a fundamental driver of variation among ant communities, and that the primary impacts of disturbance are mediated through ant functional responses to changes in openness. Like ants, terrestrial reptiles are ectotherms and are therefore especially sensitive to disturbance-induced increases in habitat openness because of changes in the thermal environment. Therefore, reptiles might also be expected to conform to a disturbance framework based on habitat openness. Here we assess the extent to which this occurs by combining a quantitative analysis of recent publications with a broader synthesis of the literature. We found strong support for the framework applying to terrestrial reptiles. We suggest that the framework can be strengthened by a mechanistic understanding of functional traits in relation to habitat openness. For ectotherms, ecophysiological traits could be particularly important for responding to disturbance-mediated changes in microclimate, but habitat openness also influences other important factors such as food availability and predation. Finally, the framework appears to be highly applicable to a wider range of faunal groups beyond ants and reptiles.

摘要

干扰是生物群落状态和动态的基本要素,了解生物对干扰的反应对于有效的生物多样性保护至关重要。然而,对于动物群落如何应对栖息地干扰的预测性理解仍然难以捉摸。最近,一个以栖息地开阔度为核心的概念框架被开发出来,用于理解蚂蚁对干扰的反应。该框架提出,栖息地开阔度是蚂蚁群落间差异的一个基本驱动因素,干扰的主要影响是通过蚂蚁对开阔度变化的功能反应来介导的。与蚂蚁一样,陆生爬行动物是变温动物,因此由于热环境的变化,它们对干扰引起的栖息地开阔度增加特别敏感。因此,爬行动物可能也符合基于栖息地开阔度的干扰框架。在这里,我们通过结合对近期出版物的定量分析和对文献的更广泛综合,来评估这种情况发生的程度。我们发现该框架适用于陆生爬行动物,得到了有力支持。我们建议,通过对与栖息地开阔度相关的功能性状进行机制性理解,可以加强该框架。对于变温动物来说,生态生理性状对于应对干扰介导的小气候变化可能尤为重要,但栖息地开阔度也会影响其他重要因素,如食物供应和捕食。最后,该框架似乎高度适用于除蚂蚁和爬行动物之外的更广泛的动物类群。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/950c/11883185/3f59682b6911/ECE3-15-e70939-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/950c/11883185/2160d663f6b9/ECE3-15-e70939-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/950c/11883185/3f6ca576591d/ECE3-15-e70939-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/950c/11883185/28548842fbc2/ECE3-15-e70939-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/950c/11883185/ee8243d69d31/ECE3-15-e70939-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/950c/11883185/3f59682b6911/ECE3-15-e70939-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/950c/11883185/2160d663f6b9/ECE3-15-e70939-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/950c/11883185/3f6ca576591d/ECE3-15-e70939-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/950c/11883185/28548842fbc2/ECE3-15-e70939-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/950c/11883185/ee8243d69d31/ECE3-15-e70939-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/950c/11883185/3f59682b6911/ECE3-15-e70939-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Faunal Responses to Habitat Disturbance: Do the Principles Explaining Responses of Ant Communities Also Apply to Terrestrial Reptiles?动物区系对栖息地干扰的响应:解释蚂蚁群落响应的原理是否也适用于陆生爬行动物?
Ecol Evol. 2025 Mar 6;15(3):e70939. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70939. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Responses of ant communities to disturbance: Five principles for understanding the disturbance dynamics of a globally dominant faunal group.蚂蚁群落对干扰的响应:理解全球占主导地位的动物类群干扰动态的五个原则。
J Anim Ecol. 2019 Mar;88(3):350-362. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12907. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
3
Habitat-contingent responses to disturbance: impacts of cattle grazing on ant communities vary with habitat complexity.生境依赖型对干扰的响应:牛放牧对蚂蚁群落的影响随生境复杂性而变化。
Ecol Appl. 2018 Oct;28(7):1808-1817. doi: 10.1002/eap.1770. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
4
Thermal biology mediates responses of amphibians and reptiles to habitat modification.热生物学调节两栖动物和爬行动物对栖息地改变的反应。
Ecol Lett. 2018 Mar;21(3):345-355. doi: 10.1111/ele.12901. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
5
The impacts of fire vary among vertical strata: Responses of ant communities to long-term experimental burning.火灾的影响在垂直层次间各不相同:蚂蚁群落对长期实验性火烧的反应。
Ecol Appl. 2024 Oct;34(7):e3025. doi: 10.1002/eap.3025. Epub 2024 Aug 21.
6
Ant community response to disturbance: A global synthesis.干扰对蚂蚁群落的响应:全球综合评估。
J Anim Ecol. 2019 Mar;88(3):346-349. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12958.
7
Contrasts in short- and long-term responses of Mediterranean reptile species to fire and habitat structure.地中海爬行动物物种对火灾和栖息地结构的短期和长期反应对比。
Oecologia. 2016 Jan;180(1):205-16. doi: 10.1007/s00442-015-3453-9. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
8
Data of ant community compositions and functional traits responding to land-use change at the local scale.在局部尺度上,蚂蚁群落组成和功能性状对土地利用变化响应的数据。
Biodivers Data J. 2022 Jul 6;10:e85119. doi: 10.3897/BDJ.10.e85119. eCollection 2022.
9
Food resource exploitation and functional resilience in ant communities found in common Mediterranean habitats.常见地中海生境中蚂蚁群落的食物资源开发与功能弹性。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Sep 20;684:126-135. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.260. Epub 2019 May 22.
10
Habitat associations of ant species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in a heterogeneous Mississippi landscape.密西西比州多样化景观中蚁种(膜翅目:蚁科)的栖息地关联
Environ Entomol. 2008 Apr;37(2):453-63. doi: 10.1603/0046-225x(2008)37[453:haoash]2.0.co;2.

本文引用的文献

1
Genetically Encoded Lizard Color Divergence for Camouflage and Thermoregulation.基因编码蜥蜴颜色的分化以实现伪装和体温调节。
Mol Biol Evol. 2024 Feb 1;41(2). doi: 10.1093/molbev/msae009.
2
Activity of (great desert skinks) at burrows in relation to plant cover and predators.(大沙漠石龙子)在洞穴中的活动与植被覆盖及捕食者的关系。
Ecol Evol. 2023 Aug 1;13(8):e10391. doi: 10.1002/ece3.10391. eCollection 2023 Aug.
3
Keeping it cool to take the heat: tropical lizards have greater thermal tolerance in less disturbed habitats.保持冷静以应对高温:受干扰较小的栖息地中的热带蜥蜴具有更高的热耐受性。
Oecologia. 2022 Aug;199(4):819-829. doi: 10.1007/s00442-022-05235-3. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
4
Animal mortality during fire.动物在火灾中的死亡率。
Glob Chang Biol. 2022 Mar;28(6):2053-2065. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16044. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
5
Resilience of reptiles to megafires.爬行动物对大火的适应能力。
Ecol Appl. 2022 Mar;32(2):e2518. doi: 10.1002/eap.2518. Epub 2022 Jan 30.
6
Distance sampling surveys reveal 17 million vertebrates directly killed by the 2020's wildfires in the Pantanal, Brazil.距离抽样调查显示,在巴西潘塔纳尔湿地,21世纪20年代的野火直接导致1700万只脊椎动物死亡。
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 16;11(1):23547. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02844-5.
7
Altered fire regimes modify lizard communities in globally endangered Araucaria forests of the southern Andes.火干扰改变了南安第斯山脉全球濒危的南洋杉森林中的蜥蜴群落。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 22;11(1):22709. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02169-3.
8
Welcome to the Pyrocene: Animal survival in the age of megafire.欢迎来到火积世:巨型火灾时代的动物生存。
Glob Chang Biol. 2021 Nov;27(22):5684-5693. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15834. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
9
The thermal ecology and physiology of reptiles and amphibians: A user's guide.爬行动物和两栖动物的热生态学和生理学:使用者指南。
J Exp Zool A Ecol Integr Physiol. 2021 Jan;335(1):13-44. doi: 10.1002/jez.2396. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
10
Can Morphology Predict the Conservation Status of Iguanian Lizards?形态学能否预测鬣蜥类蜥蜴的保护状况?
Integr Comp Biol. 2020 Aug 1;60(2):535-548. doi: 10.1093/icb/icaa074.