Altman Natasha L, Gill Edward A, Kahwash Rami, Meyer Leslie K, Wagner Jessica A, Karimpour-Fard Anis, Berning Amber A, Minobe Wayne A, Carroll Ian A, Jonas Eric R, Slavov Dobromir, Emani Sitaramesh, Abraham William T, Gollah Alexa R, Ellis Samuel L, Taylor Matthew R G, Graw Sharon L, Mestroni Luisa, McKinsey Timothy A, Buttrick Peter M, Kao David P, Bristow Michael R
Division of Cardiology (N.L.A., E.A.G., L.K.M., J.A.W., A.K.-F., W.A.M., I.A.C., E.R.J., D.S., S.L.E., M.R.G.T., S.L.G., L.M., T.A.M., P.M.B., D.P.K., M.R.B.), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora.
Division of Cardiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus (R.K., S.E., W.T.A., A.R.G.).
Circ Heart Fail. 2025 Apr;18(4):e012484. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.124.012484. Epub 2025 Mar 7.
Heart rate (HR) affects heart failure outcomes, via uncertain mechanisms that may include left ventricular remodeling. However, in human ventricular myocardium, HR change has not been associated with a particular remodeling molecular phenotype.
Patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (N=22) in sinus rhythm and refractory to β-blockade for both HR lowering and reverse remodeling were randomized 2:1 double-blind to the HCN4 (hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated potassium channel 4) channel inhibitor ivabradine or placebo for 24 weeks treatment while maintaining target doses of β-blockers. Reverse remodeling was measured by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and myocardial gene expression by sequencing RNA extracted from endomyocardial biopsies. The primary statistical analysis was between HR change categories divided at the median, which resulted in Decreased HR (N=90) and Unchanged HR (N=8) groups.
Respective HRs at baseline and 24 weeks were as follows: Decreased HR, 82.9±6.8 and 69.7±8.0 beats per minute (=0.0005) and Unchanged HR, 80.8±5.7 and 79.2±11.6 beats per minute (=0.58). All completing Decreased HR subjects were treated with ivabradine, whereas in the Unchanged HR group, 3 received ivabradine and 5 placebo. In Decreased HR, LVEF increased from 29.4±8.8% at baseline to 44.2±9.4% at 24 weeks (=0.0003), compared with respective values of 26.6±11.4% and 29.2±12.0% (=0.28) in Unchanged HR. HR and LVEF changes were not different from a previously conducted β-blocker nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy study subdivided into LVEF responders and nonresponders. However, differentially expressed genes (N=151) in the Decreased versus Unchanged HR groups were >99% nonconcordant and therefore individually unique compared with β-blocker HR/LVEF responders versus nonresponders (2 shared differentially expressed genes). Multiple unique differentially expressed genes in Decreased HR including upregulation are considered cardioprotective or involved in cardiac development.
In patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy in sinus rhythm, HR lowering per se (1) is associated with substantial left ventricular reverse remodeling; (2) its absence can cause β-blocker reverse remodeling nonresponse; and (3) when from HCN4 channel inhibition, results in a unique molecular phenotype.
URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02973594.
心率(HR)通过包括左心室重构在内的不确定机制影响心力衰竭的预后。然而,在人类心室心肌中,心率变化与特定的重构分子表型并无关联。
22例窦性心律且对β受体阻滞剂降低心率及逆向重构治疗无效的非缺血性扩张型心肌病患者,按2:1比例随机双盲接受超极化激活的环核苷酸门控钾通道4(HCN4)通道抑制剂伊伐布雷定或安慰剂治疗24周,同时维持β受体阻滞剂的目标剂量。通过左心室射血分数(LVEF)测量逆向重构,通过对心内膜活检提取的RNA进行测序来检测心肌基因表达。主要统计分析在按中位数划分的心率变化类别之间进行,这产生了心率降低组(N = 90)和心率不变组(N = 8)。
基线和24周时各自的心率如下:心率降低组,每分钟82.9±6.8次和69.7±8.0次(P = 0.0005);心率不变组,每分钟80.8±5.7次和79.2±11.6次(P = 0.58)。所有完成治疗的心率降低组受试者均接受伊伐布雷定治疗,而在心率不变组中,3例接受伊伐布雷定治疗,5例接受安慰剂治疗。在心率降低组中,LVEF从基线时的29.4±8.8%增加到24周时的44.2±9.4%(P = 0.0003),相比之下,心率不变组的相应值分别为26.6±11.4%和29.2±12.0%(P = 0.28)。心率和LVEF的变化与先前进行的一项β受体阻滞剂治疗非缺血性扩张型心肌病的研究(分为LVEF反应者和无反应者)无差异。然而,心率降低组与心率不变组中差异表达基因(N = 151)的一致性>99%不相符,因此与β受体阻滞剂治疗心率/LVEF反应者与无反应者相比,这些基因各自具有独特性(2个共享的差异表达基因)。心率降低组中多个独特的差异表达基因包括上调的基因被认为具有心脏保护作用或参与心脏发育。
在窦性心律的非缺血性扩张型心肌病患者中,降低心率本身(1)与显著的左心室逆向重构相关;(2)心率未降低可导致β受体阻滞剂逆向重构无反应;(3)当通过抑制HCN4通道降低心率时,会产生独特的分子表型。