Suppr超能文献

日本临床肿瘤学会妇科癌症研究组针对晚期卵巢癌患者新辅助化疗后中间减瘤手术中淋巴结清扫范围的问卷调查。

Questionnaire-based survey on the extent of lymph node dissection during interval debulking surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with advanced ovarian cancer in the Gynecologic Cancer Study Group of JCOG.

作者信息

Iida Yuki, Kobayashi-Kato Mayumi, Komatsu Hiroaki, Ishikawa Mitsuya, Satoh Toyomi

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tottori University Faculty of Medicine, Yonago, Tottori, Japan.

Department of Gynecology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-Ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Clin Oncol. 2025 May;30(5):1040-1047. doi: 10.1007/s10147-025-02734-0. Epub 2025 Mar 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The significance of lymph node dissection (LND) in primary debulking surgery (PDS) for advanced ovarian cancer was demonstrated in the LION trial. However, the role and the current practices of LND during interval debulking surgery (IDS) remains unclear. We aimed to conduct a survey of the current LND practices.

METHODS

A questionnaire-based survey regarding the criteria and extent of LND for advanced ovarian cancer was conducted by the Gynecologic Cancer Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG). We defined enlarged lymph nodes as 10 mm or more in the short axis on imaging.

RESULTS

This study included data from 51 institutions. Factors contributing to the decision regarding the extent of LND included performance status, completeness of cytoreductive surgery excluding the lymph nodes, and age. Regarding PDS cases with enlarged lymph nodes, 90% of all institutions opted for systematic LND (SyLND) or removal of only the enlarged lymph nodes (SeLND). In IDS cases with enlarged lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), 15 (29%) and 35 (69%) institutions opted for SyLND and SeLND, respectively. In contrast, in IDS cases in which enlarged lymph nodes were reduced after NACT, approximately half the institutions opted for no LND.

CONCLUSION

This study found no established standard treatment for LND during IDS in patients with enlarged lymph nodes among the JCOG institutions. Thus, further prospective studies comparing the prognostic outcomes with or without LND are warranted.

摘要

背景

LION试验证明了淋巴结清扫术(LND)在晚期卵巢癌初次肿瘤细胞减灭术(PDS)中的重要性。然而,中间型肿瘤细胞减灭术(IDS)期间LND的作用及当前实践仍不明确。我们旨在对当前LND的实践进行一项调查。

方法

日本临床肿瘤学会(JCOG)的妇科癌症研究组开展了一项关于晚期卵巢癌LND标准及范围的问卷调查。我们将影像学检查中短径≥10 mm的淋巴结定义为肿大淋巴结。

结果

本研究纳入了51家机构的数据。影响LND范围决策的因素包括体能状态、不包括淋巴结的肿瘤细胞减灭术的彻底性以及年龄。对于伴有肿大淋巴结的PDS病例,所有机构中有90%选择了系统性淋巴结清扫术(SyLND)或仅切除肿大淋巴结(SeLND)。在新辅助化疗(NACT)后伴有肿大淋巴结的IDS病例中,分别有15家(29%)和35家(69%)机构选择了SyLND和SeLND。相比之下,在NACT后肿大淋巴结缩小的IDS病例中,约半数机构选择不进行LND。

结论

本研究发现,在JCOG各机构中,对于伴有肿大淋巴结的患者,IDS期间LND尚无既定的标准治疗方案。因此,有必要进一步开展前瞻性研究,比较进行或不进行LND的预后结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验