Negm Ahmed, Roberts Brad, Vette Albert H, Jones Allyson, Beaupre Lauren
Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Gait Posture. 2025 Jun;119:118-126. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.02.006. Epub 2025 Feb 26.
It is unclear how knee biomechanics in individuals with Sarcopenic Obesity and osteoarthritis (OA-SO) affect ambulation relative to those with knee osteoarthritis (OA) without SO. The primary objective of this study was to compare the knee kinematics and spatio-temporal gait parameters during treadmill walking using simulated terrain modifications in individuals with end-stage knee OA awaiting total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with SO and obesity (OA-SO group) versus those with knee OA without SO (OA group).
We performed a cross-sectional analysis of individuals with knee OA (with or without SO) awaiting TKA. Gait assessments using Computer-Assisted Rehabilitation Environment (CAREN) occurred within one month before TKA; each participant was asked to perform two trials of self-selected treadmill speed for each of the following six walking conditions: (1) level; (2) uphill; (3) downhill; (4) cross slope with the affected body side elevated; (5) cross slope with the unaffected side elevated; and (6) medial-lateral walking surface translations. Data analyses compared demographics, gait kinematics, spatio-temporal, and clinical outcome measures between the groups using a two-tailed independent t-test for continuous measures and Chi Square tests for categorical data.
The groups were similar in age and sex distribution (P = 0.90 and 0.37, respectively). Of the 18 participants with knee OA, eight were classified as with and ten without SO. On the affected side, the group-level knee flexion-extension range was significantly larger in the OA group compared to OA-SO group for all six walking conditions during the full gait cycle. The OA group walked significantly faster than the OA-SO group for all walking conditions. The stride length and step length were significantly longer in the OA group than in the OA-SO group during four of the six walking conditions.
Gait assessment for different walking conditions adds important information to level walking assessments. Individuals with knee OA and SO have less knee range of motion, are slower, and less stride and step length, compared to individuals with OA only. This study may indicate the need for preoperative and postoperative rehabilitation programs to address the needs of individuals with knee OA and SO.
目前尚不清楚肌少症肥胖合并骨关节炎(OA-SO)患者的膝关节生物力学与无肌少症的膝关节骨关节炎(OA)患者相比如何影响行走。本研究的主要目的是比较在等待全膝关节置换术(TKA)的终末期膝关节OA患者中,肌少症肥胖合并肥胖(OA-SO组)与无肌少症的膝关节OA患者(OA组)在使用模拟地形变化的跑步机行走过程中的膝关节运动学和时空步态参数。
我们对等待TKA的膝关节OA患者(有或无肌少症)进行了横断面分析。在TKA前一个月内使用计算机辅助康复环境(CAREN)进行步态评估;要求每位参与者在以下六种行走条件下,以自我选择的跑步机速度进行两次试验:(1)水平;(2)上坡;(3)下坡;(4)患侧身体侧抬高的交叉斜坡;(5)未受影响侧抬高的交叉斜坡;(6)内外侧行走表面平移。数据分析使用双尾独立t检验比较连续测量指标的人口统计学、步态运动学、时空和临床结局指标,使用卡方检验比较分类数据。
两组在年龄和性别分布上相似(P分别为0.90和0.37)。在18名膝关节OA患者中,8名被归类为患有肌少症,10名没有。在患侧,在整个步态周期的所有六种行走条件下,OA组的组水平膝关节屈伸范围均显著大于OA-SO组。在所有行走条件下,OA组的行走速度明显快于OA-SO组。在六种行走条件中的四种情况下,OA组的步幅和步长明显长于OA-SO组。
对不同行走条件的步态评估为水平行走评估增加了重要信息。与仅患有OA的个体相比,患有膝关节OA和肌少症的个体膝关节活动范围更小、速度更慢、步幅和步长更小。本研究可能表明需要术前和术后康复计划来满足膝关节OA和肌少症患者的需求。