• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年恶性肿瘤患者机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术后体内与体外尿流改道的系统评价和荟萃分析

A systematic review and meta-analysis of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal urinary diversion after robotic-assisted radical cystectomy in elderly patients with malignancy.

作者信息

Cao Lin, Huang Li-Ge, Zhang Li-Hao, Yang Gang, Li Jia-Bing

机构信息

North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.

The First People's Hospital of Mian Yang, Mianyang, China.

出版信息

J Robot Surg. 2025 Mar 10;19(1):106. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02268-7.

DOI:10.1007/s11701-025-02268-7
PMID:40059272
Abstract

Recent studies have highlighted the progress of robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC), yet information on intracorporeal (ICUD) and extracorporeal urinary diversion (ECUD), especially in elderly patients, remains limited. This review seeks to address this gap in the literature. A systematic literature review was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases, following the PRISMA guidelines. Studies comparing ICUD to ECUD in patients aged ≥ 65 years. We combined the data using weighted mean differences (WMD) or odds ratios (OR) with random-effects models. For results showing moderate-to-high heterogeneity, a sensitivity analysis was performed by sequentially excluding individual studies. Nine studies comprising 4340 patients (1967 in ICUD and 2373 in ECUD) were included in the meta-analysis. ICUD was associated with significantly lower estimated blood loss (WMD: - 64.34 mL, 95% CI: - 113.26, - 15.42, P = 0.01), reduced blood transfusion rates (OR: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.11, 0.76, P = 0.01), and fewer overall gastrointestinal complications (OR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.46, 0.92, P = 0.016) compared to ECUD in patients aged 65 and older. No significant differences were found in operative duration, length of hospitalization, or 30-day/90-day complication and readmission rates. Sensitivity analysis indicated low evidence for outcomes such as blood loss and transfusion rates. Overall, elderly patients undergoing RARC may benefit from ICUD in terms of reduced blood loss, lower blood transfusion rates, and fewer gastrointestinal complications. However, large prospective randomized studies are still required to confirm these findings.

摘要

近期研究突显了机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术(RARC)的进展,但关于体内尿流改道术(ICUD)和体外尿流改道术(ECUD)的信息,尤其是在老年患者中,仍然有限。本综述旨在填补文献中的这一空白。按照PRISMA指南,在PubMed、Embase、科学网和考克兰图书馆数据库中进行了系统的文献综述。纳入了比较年龄≥65岁患者的ICUD与ECUD的研究。我们使用加权平均差(WMD)或比值比(OR)以及随机效应模型合并数据。对于显示中度至高异质性的结果,通过依次排除个别研究进行敏感性分析。荟萃分析纳入了9项研究,共4340例患者(ICUD组1967例,ECUD组2373例)。与65岁及以上患者的ECUD相比,ICUD与显著更低的估计失血量(WMD:-64.34 mL,95%CI:-113.26,-15.42,P = 0.01)、更低的输血率(OR:0.29,95%CI:0.11,0.76,P = 0.01)以及更少的总体胃肠道并发症(OR:0.65,95%CI:0.46,0.92,P = 0.016)相关。在手术时间、住院时长或30天/90天并发症及再入院率方面未发现显著差异。敏感性分析表明,失血量和输血率等结果的证据强度较低。总体而言,接受RARC的老年患者在减少失血量、降低输血率和减少胃肠道并发症方面可能从ICUD中获益。然而,仍需要大型前瞻性随机研究来证实这些发现。

相似文献

1
A systematic review and meta-analysis of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal urinary diversion after robotic-assisted radical cystectomy in elderly patients with malignancy.老年恶性肿瘤患者机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术后体内与体外尿流改道的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Robot Surg. 2025 Mar 10;19(1):106. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02268-7.
2
Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal urinary diversion following robot-assisted radical cystectomy: a meta-analysis, cumulative analysis, and systematic review.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术后的体内与体外尿流改道术:荟萃分析、累积分析和系统评价。
J Robot Surg. 2021 Jun;15(3):321-333. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01174-4. Epub 2020 Nov 22.
3
Perioperative outcomes and complications of intracorporeal vs extracorporeal urinary diversion after robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a real-life, multi-institutional french study.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术后膀胱癌患者行体腔内与体腔外尿流改道术的围手术期结局和并发症:一项真实世界、多机构的法国研究。
World J Urol. 2018 Nov;36(11):1711-1718. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2313-8. Epub 2018 May 9.
4
Analysis of intracorporeal compared with extracorporeal urinary diversion after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术后的体内与体外尿流改道术比较分析:来自国际机器人膀胱切除术联盟的数据。
Eur Urol. 2014 Feb;65(2):340-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.09.042. Epub 2013 Oct 9.
5
Intracorporeal Versus Extracorporeal Urinary Diversion Following Robotic-Assisted Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer in Patients ≥ 65 Years of Age: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.≥65岁膀胱癌患者机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术后体内与体外尿流改道:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Cureus. 2025 Feb 3;17(2):e78406. doi: 10.7759/cureus.78406. eCollection 2025 Feb.
6
Comparison of Extracorporeal and Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion after Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术后体外和体内尿流改道的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Am J Mens Health. 2024 Sep-Oct;18(5):15579883241274866. doi: 10.1177/15579883241274866.
7
Safe transition from extracorporeal to intracorporeal urinary diversion following robot-assisted cystectomy: a recipe for reducing operative time, blood loss and complication rates.机器人辅助膀胱切除术后从体外到体内尿流改道的安全过渡:降低手术时间、出血量和并发症发生率的秘诀。
World J Urol. 2019 Feb;37(2):367-372. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2386-4. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
8
Comparison of perioperative outcomes and complications of robot assisted radical cystectomy with extracorporeal vs intracorporeal urinary diversion.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术采用体外与体内尿流改道术的围手术期结果及并发症比较。
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2019 Jul-Aug;43(6):277-283. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
9
Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion decreases postoperative complications only in highly comorbid patients: findings that rely on a standardized methodology recommended by the European Association of Urology Guidelines.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术联合体内尿流改道术仅在高度合并症患者中可降低术后并发症:这一发现基于欧洲泌尿外科学会指南推荐的标准化方法。
World J Urol. 2021 Mar;39(3):803-812. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03237-5. Epub 2020 May 17.
10
Comparison of perioperative outcomes between extracorporeal and intracorporeal urethral diversion in robot-assisted radical cystectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术中体外与体内尿道改道围手术期结局的比较:一项荟萃分析与系统评价
J Robot Surg. 2025 May 6;19(1):200. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02349-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Perioperative and functional outcomes of single-port versus multi-port robotic-assisted radical cystectomy: evidence-based on controlled studies.单端口与多端口机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的围手术期和功能结果:基于对照研究的循证证据。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Sep 23;18(1):344. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02094-3.
2
Is Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index a Real Non-Invasive Biomarker to Predict Oncological Outcomes in Patients Eligible for Radical Cystectomy?系统免疫炎症指数是否为一种预测根治性膀胱切除术患者肿瘤学结局的真正无创性生物标志物?
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Nov 22;59(12):2063. doi: 10.3390/medicina59122063.
3
Comparison of perioperative outcomes and complications between intracorporeal, extracorporeal, and hybrid ileal conduit urinary diversion during robot-assisted radical cystectomy: a comparative propensity score-matched analysis from nationwide multi-institutional study in Japan.
比较机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术期间腔内、腔外和混合回肠通道尿流改道的围手术期结局和并发症:来自日本全国多机构研究的倾向性评分匹配分析。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2024 Jan;29(1):64-71. doi: 10.1007/s10147-023-02425-8. Epub 2023 Oct 21.
4
Intracorporeal Versus Extracorporeal Neobladder After Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy: Results From the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术后的体内与体外新膀胱:来自国际机器人膀胱切除术联盟的结果。
Urology. 2022 Jan;159:127-132. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.10.012. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
5
Perioperative Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy with Intracorporeal Versus Extracorporeal Urinary Diversion.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术采用体内与体外尿流改道术的围手术期结果
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Dec;28(13):9209-9215. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10295-5. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
6
Radical cystectomy: a review of techniques, developments and controversies.根治性膀胱切除术:技术、进展与争议综述
Transl Androl Urol. 2020 Dec;9(6):3073-3081. doi: 10.21037/tau.2020.03.23.
7
Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy for Nonmetastatic Urothelial Carcinoma of Urinary Bladder: A Comparison Between Intracorporeal Versus Extracorporeal Orthotopic Ileal Neobladder.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术治疗非转移性膀胱尿路上皮癌:经体腔内与经体外原位回肠代膀胱的比较。
J Endourol. 2021 Feb;35(2):151-158. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0622. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
8
Do patients benefit from total intracorporeal robotic radical cystectomy?: A comparative analysis with extracorporeal robotic radical cystectomy from a Korean multicenter study.全腹腔镜下机器人根治性膀胱切除术是否使患者受益?:来自韩国多中心研究的与体外机器人根治性膀胱切除术的对比分析。
Investig Clin Urol. 2020 Jan;61(1):11-18. doi: 10.4111/icu.2020.61.1.11. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
9
Multicenter Analysis of Postoperative Complications in Octogenarians After Radical Cystectomy and Ureterocutaneostomy: The Role of the Frailty Index.多中心分析 80 岁以上患者根治性膀胱切除加输尿管皮肤造口术后的术后并发症:衰弱指数的作用。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019 Oct;17(5):402-407. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.07.002. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
10
AUTHOR REPLY.作者回复。
Urology. 2019 Jul;129:98. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.11.061.