Sisson Susan B, Leidner Jean, Hall Spencer, Williams Bethany D, Vesely Sara K, Poe Tiffany, Ward Dianne S, Crosscut Cady, Hildebrand Deana, Salvatore Alicia L
Department of Nutritional Sciences, College of Allied Health, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Hudson College of Public Health, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Child Obes. 2025 Jul;21(5):476-488. doi: 10.1089/chi.2024.0361. Epub 2025 Mar 10.
Enhancing the quality of Family Child Care Home (FCCH) meals is an opportunity to impact children's diet and health. The purpose of this study is to assess Happy Healthy Homes (HHH) randomized controlled trial impact on health-related foods and nutrients served to and consumed by young children and achievement of Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) requirements and best practices. Forty-five CACFP participating FCCHs in a moderately sized midwestern city were recruited in 2017-2018 and randomized to nutrition intervention (NUT = 24) or control (CON = 21). Participants received two in-home, individual 90-minute education sessions, one 3-hour small group class, and a 15-minute check-in phone call over 3 months. Outcomes include 3- and 12-month served and consumed fiber, sugar, grains, vegetables, and fruit and achievement of CACFP Best Practices. Primary analyses at 12 months used a mixed model under an intent-to-treat paradigm to account for repeated measures on participants with 3-month outcomes. Sensitivity analyses were completed on those with complete 12-month measures. There were no statistically significant group-by-time effects for foods served, consumed, or CACFP Best Practices score in the primary analysis. However, in sensitivity analysis, the CACFP Best Practice score (out of 18) increased in NUT +0.5 from 8.9 ± 1.5 at baseline at 12 months and decreased -0.9 in CON from 9.9 ± 1.7 at baseline, group by time = 0.05. The HHH intervention did improve the CACFP Best Practices score for lunches served. The study's effect may have been limited due to sample size and attrition. Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03560050. Retrospectively registered on 23 May 2018. First participant enrolled October 2017.
提高家庭托育之家(FCCH)膳食质量是影响儿童饮食与健康的一个契机。本研究的目的是评估“快乐健康之家”(HHH)随机对照试验对幼儿所提供和食用的与健康相关的食物及营养素的影响,以及儿童与成人照料食品计划(CACFP)要求和最佳实践的达成情况。2017年至2018年,在中西部一个中等规模城市招募了45个参与CACFP的家庭托育之家,并将其随机分为营养干预组(NUT = 24)或对照组(CON = 21)。参与者在3个月内接受了两次90分钟的上门个别教育课程、一次3小时的小组课程以及一次15分钟的电话跟进。结果包括3个月和12个月时提供和食用的纤维、糖、谷物、蔬菜和水果,以及CACFP最佳实践的达成情况。12个月时的主要分析采用意向性分析范式下的混合模型,以考虑对有3个月结果的参与者的重复测量。对有完整12个月测量数据的参与者进行了敏感性分析。在主要分析中,所提供、食用的食物或CACFP最佳实践得分没有统计学上显著的组×时间效应。然而,在敏感性分析中,营养干预组(NUT)的CACFP最佳实践得分(满分18分)从基线时的8.9±1.5在12个月时增加了0.5,而对照组(CON)从基线时的9.9±1.7下降了0.9,组×时间 = 0.05。HHH干预确实提高了所提供午餐的CACFP最佳实践得分。由于样本量和损耗,该研究的效果可能有限。Clinicaltrials.gov,NCT03560050。于2018年5月23日进行回顾性注册。第一名参与者于2017年10月入组。