Xiang Qiong, Xu Peiwei, Zhai Zhaolin, Jia Yuping, Li Chunbo, Liu Dengtang
Division of Psychotic Disorders, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200030, People's Republic of China.
Clinical Center for Psychotic Disorders, National Center for Mental Disorders, Shanghai, 200030, People's Republic of China.
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2025 Mar 5;21:491-501. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S497725. eCollection 2025.
The study aims to compare the clinical efficacy and cognitive side effect of magnetic seizure therapy (MST) and modified electroconvulsive therapy (MECT) on clozapine resistant schizophrenia (CRS).
Sixteen patients with CRS were enrolled in this randomized, parallel-group, controlled clinical trial. Patients were randomly allocated to receive 10 sessions of add-on MST or MECT over 4 weeks (1:1 ratio) and continued clozapine therapy during the study. Efficacy and neurocognition were assessed at baseline, 4-week and 8-week follow-up.
(1) Clinical efficacy: MST significantly improved symptoms of schizophrenia from baseline to 4 weeks, as shown in PANSS total (p = 0.009), PANSS positive (p = 0.026), PANSS negative (p = 0.031) and PANSS general psychopathology (p = 0.023); we also observed significant reductions in PANSS total (p = 0.049) and PANSS positive (p = 0.037) at 8-week follow-up. MECT group also witnessed clinical improvement from baseline to 4-week in PANSS total (p = 0.035) and PANSS positive (p = 0.001); significant reduction in PANSS positive was also observed at 8-week follow-up (p = 0.041). From baseline to 8 weeks, PANSS negative had greater reduction in MST group compared with MECT group (p = 0.042). (2) Neurocognition: Pre-and post-treatment data showed no significant cognitive adverse effects in both groups. Immediate memory is better in patients who received MST than MECT at 4-week follow-up (p = 0.030).
In this pilot study, MST and MECT equally improved positive symptoms of CRS, while MST was more effective in relieving negative symptoms. Evidence showed negligible cognitive side effects in MST, with less adverse effect on immediate memory than MECT. As a promising alternative to MECT, MST requires further research in larger clinical population.
本研究旨在比较磁休克治疗(MST)和改良电休克治疗(MECT)对氯氮平抵抗性精神分裂症(CRS)的临床疗效及认知副作用。
16例CRS患者纳入本随机、平行组、对照临床试验。患者被随机分配接受为期4周的10次附加MST或MECT治疗(1:1比例),研究期间继续氯氮平治疗。在基线、4周和8周随访时评估疗效和神经认知。
(1)临床疗效:从基线到4周,MST显著改善了精神分裂症症状,如阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)总分(p = 0.009)、阳性量表(p = 0.026)、阴性量表(p = 0.031)和一般精神病理学量表(p = 0.023);在8周随访时,我们还观察到PANSS总分(p = 0.049)和阳性量表(p = 0.037)显著降低。MECT组从基线到4周时PANSS总分(p = 0.035)和阳性量表(p = 0.001)也有临床改善;在8周随访时也观察到阳性量表显著降低(p = 0.041)。从基线到8周,MST组的PANSS阴性量表降低幅度大于MECT组(p = 0.042)。(2)神经认知:治疗前后数据显示两组均无显著的认知不良反应。在4周随访时,接受MST的患者即时记忆比接受MECT的患者更好(p = 0.030)。
在本初步研究中,MST和MECT同样改善了CRS患者的阳性症状,而MST在缓解阴性症状方面更有效。证据表明MST的认知副作用可忽略不计,对即时记忆的不良影响小于MECT。作为MECT有前景的替代方法,MST需要在更大的临床人群中进一步研究。