Bafna Tanvi, Malik Mansoor, Choudhury Mohua C, Hu William, Weston Christine M, Weeks Kristina R, Connors Cheryl, Burhanullah M Haroon, Everly George, Michtalik Henry J, Wu Albert W
Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Department of Psychiatry, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Feb 21;12:1531090. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1531090. eCollection 2025.
Healthcare workers' well-being is of utmost importance given persistent high rates of burnout, which also affects quality of care. Minority healthcare workers (MHCW) face unique challenges including structural racism and discrimination. There is limited data on interventions addressing the psychological well-being of MHCW. Thus, this systematic review aims to identify interventions specifically designed to support MHCW well-being, and to compare measures of well-being between minority and non-minority healthcare workers.
We searched multiple electronic databases. Two independent reviewers conducted literature screening and extraction. The Mixed Methods Assessment Tool (MMAT) or Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) criteria were utilized to assess the methodological quality of studies, based on the study design. Total scores as percentages of criteria met were used to determine overall quality as low (<40%), moderate (40-80%), or high (>80%). For conflicts, consensus was reached through discussion. Meta-analysis was not possible due to heterogeneity of study designs.
A total of 3,816 records were screened and 43 were included in the review. The majority of included studies (76.7%) were of moderate quality. There were no randomized control trials and only one study included a well-being intervention designed specifically for MHCW. Most (67.4%) were quantitative-descriptive studies that compared well-being measures between minority and non-minority identifying healthcare workers. Common themes identified were burnout, job retention, job satisfaction, discrimination, and diversity. There were conflicting results regarding burnout rates in MHCW vs non-minority workers with some studies citing protective resilience and lower burnout while others reported greater burnout due to compounding systemic factors.
Our findings illuminate a lack of MHCW-specific well-being programs. The conflicting findings of MHCW well-being do not eliminate the need for supports among this population. Given the distinct experiences of MHCW, the development of policies surrounding diversity and inclusion, mental health services, and cultural competency should be considered. Understanding the barriers faced by MHCW can improve both well-being among the healthcare workforce and patient care.
鉴于职业倦怠率持续居高不下,医护人员的福祉至关重要,而职业倦怠也会影响护理质量。少数族裔医护人员面临着包括结构性种族主义和歧视在内的独特挑战。针对少数族裔医护人员心理健康的干预措施的数据有限。因此,本系统综述旨在确定专门为支持少数族裔医护人员福祉而设计的干预措施,并比较少数族裔和非少数族裔医护人员的福祉衡量指标。
我们检索了多个电子数据库。两名独立评审员进行文献筛选和提取。根据研究设计,使用混合方法评估工具(MMAT)或乔安娜·布里格斯研究所(JBI)标准来评估研究的方法学质量。以符合标准的百分比计算的总分用于确定总体质量为低(<40%)、中(40-80%)或高(>80%)。对于冲突,通过讨论达成共识。由于研究设计的异质性,无法进行荟萃分析。
共筛选了3816条记录,43条纳入综述。纳入的研究大多(76.7%)质量中等。没有随机对照试验,只有一项研究包括专门为少数族裔医护人员设计的福祉干预措施。大多数(67.4%)是定量描述性研究,比较了少数族裔和非少数族裔在职医护人员的福祉衡量指标。确定的共同主题是职业倦怠、工作保留、工作满意度、歧视和多样性。少数族裔医护人员与非少数族裔医护人员的职业倦怠率存在相互矛盾的结果,一些研究指出少数族裔具有保护性复原力且职业倦怠率较低,而另一些研究则报告由于系统性因素的叠加,少数族裔的职业倦怠情况更严重。
我们的研究结果表明缺乏专门针对少数族裔医护人员的福祉计划。少数族裔医护人员福祉方面相互矛盾的研究结果并不消除该人群对支持的需求。鉴于少数族裔医护人员的独特经历,应考虑制定围绕多样性和包容性、心理健康服务以及文化能力的政策。了解少数族裔医护人员面临的障碍可以改善医护人员队伍的福祉和患者护理。