Abdelrazek Ahmad S, Greason Kevin L, Lee Alex, Lahr Brian D, Arghami Arman, Stulak John M, Daly Richard C, Crestanello Juan A, Schaff Hartzell V
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
JTCVS Open. 2024 Nov 19;23:150-156. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2024.11.005. eCollection 2025 Feb.
Previous studies have reported an increased risk of stroke with non-full sternotomy access during cardiac valve operations, but the clinical significance of these strokes has not yet been explored. We sought to determine the incidence and clinical magnitude of postoperative stroke following non-full versus full sternotomy access.
We analyzed the records of 12,406 patients who underwent a cardiac valve operation with full median sternotomy (n = 10,863; 88%), partial sternotomy (n = 219; 1.8%), or thoracotomy (n = 1324; 11%) access between January 1997 and March 2021. The primary outcome was permanent stroke, categorized using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS; score 0-6) at discharge. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess the risk of stroke.
The rate of stroke was 1.0% in the full sternotomy group, 2.7% in the partial sternotomy group, and 1.2% in the thoracotomy group ( = .044). The majority of strokes were mildly disabling (mRS ≤2), both overall (n = 82; 62%) and in each group (range, 60%-69%). There was an increased risk of stroke with partial versus full sternotomy (odds ratio [OR], 3.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.59-8.78; = .010) but not with thoracotomy versus full sternotomy (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.48-3.77). There was no differential effect of sternotomy type on stroke risk according to type of valve operation ( = .985). Stroke-related mortality was uncommon (1.3%).
Partial sternotomy versus full sternotomy is associated with increased risk of stroke, whereas thoracotomy versus full sternotomy is not. The risk of stroke is low, with most strokes being only mildly disabling.
既往研究报告称,心脏瓣膜手术中采用非全胸骨切开术入路会增加中风风险,但这些中风的临床意义尚未得到探讨。我们试图确定非全胸骨切开术与全胸骨切开术入路术后中风的发生率及临床严重程度。
我们分析了1997年1月至2021年3月期间12406例行心脏瓣膜手术患者的记录,这些患者采用全正中胸骨切开术(n = 10863;88%)、部分胸骨切开术(n = 219;1.8%)或开胸术(n = 1324;11%)入路。主要结局为永久性中风,出院时使用改良Rankin量表(mRS;评分0 - 6)进行分类。采用多变量逻辑回归分析评估中风风险。
全胸骨切开术组中风发生率为1.0%,部分胸骨切开术组为2.7%,开胸术组为1.2%(P = 0.044)。总体而言(n = 82;62%)以及各亚组(范围为60% - 69%),大多数中风仅造成轻度功能障碍(mRS≤2)。与全胸骨切开术相比,部分胸骨切开术会增加中风风险(比值比[OR],3.73;95%置信区间[CI],1.59 - 8.78;P = 0.010),但开胸术与全胸骨切开术相比则不会增加中风风险(OR,1.34;95% CI,0.48 - 3.77)。根据瓣膜手术类型,胸骨切开术类型对中风风险无差异影响(P = 0.985)。中风相关死亡率较低(1.3%)。
与全胸骨切开术相比,部分胸骨切开术会增加中风风险,而开胸术与全胸骨切开术相比则不会。中风风险较低,大多数中风仅造成轻度功能障碍。