Suppr超能文献

果蝇对纯气味剂的嗅觉受体反应

Olfactory Receptor Responses to Pure Odorants in Drosophila melanogaster.

作者信息

Lüdke Alja, Kumaraswamy Ajayrama, Galizia C Giovanni

机构信息

University of Konstanz, Constance, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Neurosci. 2025 Mar;61(5):e70036. doi: 10.1111/ejn.70036.

Abstract

Olfactory coding relies on primary information from olfactory receptor cells that respond to volatile airborne substances. Despite extensive efforts, our understanding of odor-response profiles across receptors is still poor, because of the vast number of possible ligands (odorants), the high sensitivity even to trace compounds (creating false positive responses), and the diversity of olfactory receptors. Here, we linked chemical purification with a gas chromatograph to single-receptor type recording with transgenic flies using calcium imaging to record olfactory responses to a large panel of chemicals in seven Drosophila ORs: Or10a, Or13a, Or22a, Or42b, Or47a, Or56a, and Or92a. We analyze the data using linear-nonlinear modeling and reveal that most receptors have "simple" response types (mostly positive: Or10a, Or13a, Or22a, Or47a, and Or56a). However, two receptors (Or42b and Or92a) have, in addition to "simple" responses, "complex" response types to some ligands, either positive with a negative second phase or negative with a positive second phase, suggesting the presence of multiple binding sites and/or transduction cascades. We show that some ligands reported in the literature are false positives, because of contaminations in the stimulus. We recorded all stimuli across concentrations, showing that at different concentrations, different substances appear as best ligands. Our data show that studying combinatorial olfactory coding must consider temporal response properties and odorant concentration and, in addition, is strongly influenced by the presence of trace amounts of ligands (contaminations) in the samples. These observations have important repercussions for our thinking about how animals navigate their olfactory environment.

摘要

嗅觉编码依赖于嗅觉受体细胞的初级信息,这些细胞对空气中的挥发性物质做出反应。尽管付出了巨大努力,但由于可能的配体(气味剂)数量众多、对痕量化合物的高敏感性(会产生假阳性反应)以及嗅觉受体的多样性,我们对不同受体的气味反应谱的了解仍然不足。在这里,我们将化学纯化与气相色谱仪相结合,通过钙成像技术对转基因果蝇进行单受体类型记录,以记录七种果蝇嗅觉受体(Or10a、Or13a、Or22a、Or42b、Or47a、Or56a和Or92a)对大量化学物质的嗅觉反应。我们使用线性 - 非线性模型分析数据,发现大多数受体具有“简单”的反应类型(大多为阳性:Or10a、Or13a、Or22a、Or47a和Or56a)。然而,有两种受体(Or42b和Or92a)除了具有“简单”反应外,对某些配体还具有“复杂”的反应类型,要么是先正后负,要么是先负后正,这表明存在多个结合位点和/或转导级联。我们发现文献中报道的一些配体是假阳性,原因是刺激物中存在污染物。我们记录了所有浓度下的刺激情况,表明在不同浓度下,不同物质表现为最佳配体。我们的数据表明,研究组合嗅觉编码必须考虑时间反应特性和气味剂浓度,此外,还会受到样品中痕量配体(污染物)存在的强烈影响。这些观察结果对我们理解动物如何在嗅觉环境中导航具有重要影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验