Kapur Payal, Zhong Hua, Christie Alana, Xu Haitao, Cai Qi, Araj Ellen, Kim David, Miyata Jeffrey, Tcheuyap Vanina T, Ball Colleen T, Thiel David D, Parker Alexander, Antwi Samuel O, Leibovich Brad C, Modrusan Zora, Cheville John C, Brugarolas James
Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States.
Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2025 Jul 1;117(7):1387-1400. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaf060.
The mechanisms underlying metastatic latency in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remain poorly understood.
This study evaluated 2 large independent cohorts for differences in tumor biology between patients who developed metastases early (≤1 year after nephrectomy) and those with late onset (>3 years).
In the discovery cohort (n = 161), late metastatic RCC was associated with clear cell histology (88.9% vs 78.7%), lower pathological stage (pT1-2; 40.3% vs 18.0%), and favorable histopathological features including low grade (40.0% vs 2.3%), less sarcomatoid (5.6% vs 21.8%), and reduced necrosis (37.7% vs 78.3%; all P < .02). Late metastatic RCC tumors exhibited increased angiogenesis (63.5% vs 19.4%) and reduced inflammation (78.8% vs 50.0%; all P < .02) profiles. Genomic driver analyses revealed comparable rates of PBRM1 and SETD2 loss in late and early metastatic RCC, while BAP1 loss was significantly less common in late metastatic RCC (7.5% vs 27.1%; P < .02). In multivariable models, BAP1/PBRM1/SETD2 status and tumor necrosis emerged as key discriminators of late metastatic RCCs. These findings were confirmed in the second cohort (n = 307). Late metastatic RCC was enriched for fatty acid oxidation and angiogenesis pathways, supporting a less aggressive phenotype. This was further evidenced by a lower engraftment rate in murine models (0% vs 36.5%; P < .001) and significantly longer overall survival from the time of metastasis (median survival doubled, P < .001). Interestingly, late metastatic RCC shared genomic and phenotypic features with RCC that metastasizes to the pancreas, suggesting a common underlying biology influencing both metastatic latency and pancreatic tropism.
Overall, these findings advocate for recognition of late metastatic RCC because of its distinct biology and improved prognosis.
肾细胞癌(RCC)转移潜伏期的潜在机制仍知之甚少。
本研究评估了2个大型独立队列,以比较早期发生转移(肾切除术后≤1年)和晚期发生转移(>3年)患者之间的肿瘤生物学差异。
在发现队列(n = 161)中,晚期转移性RCC与透明细胞组织学相关(88.9%对78.7%),病理分期较低(pT1-2;40.3%对18.0%),以及具有良好的组织病理学特征,包括低级别(40.0%对2.3%)、较少肉瘤样变(5.6%对21.8%)和坏死减少(37.7%对78.3%;所有P < 0.02)。晚期转移性RCC肿瘤表现出血管生成增加(63.5%对19.4%)和炎症减少(78.8%对50.0%;所有P < 0.02)。基因组驱动分析显示,晚期和早期转移性RCC中PBRM1和SETD2缺失率相当,而BAP1缺失在晚期转移性RCC中明显较少见(7.5%对27.1%;P < 0.02)。在多变量模型中,BAP1/PBRM1/SETD2状态和肿瘤坏死成为晚期转移性RCC的关键鉴别因素。这些发现在第二个队列(n = 307)中得到证实。晚期转移性RCC富含脂肪酸氧化和血管生成途径,支持其侵袭性较低的表型。这在小鼠模型中植入率较低(0%对36.5%;P < 0.001)以及转移后总生存期显著延长(中位生存期翻倍,P < 0.001)中得到进一步证明。有趣的是,晚期转移性RCC与转移至胰腺的RCC具有共同的基因组和表型特征,提示存在影响转移潜伏期和胰腺嗜性的共同潜在生物学机制。
总体而言,这些发现支持认识晚期转移性RCC,因其具有独特的生物学特性和改善的预后。