Kim Hye-Geum, Bai Dai-Seg, Koo Bon-Hoon, Cheon Eun-Jin, Yun Seokho, Jo So Hye, Gu Byoungyoung
Department of Psychiatry, Yeungnam University Medical Center, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Department of Psychology, Yeungnam University Medical Center, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
J Korean Med Sci. 2025 Mar 10;40(9):e20. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e20.
Dementia is a multifaceted disorder that affects cognitive function, necessitating accurate diagnosis for effective management and treatment. Although the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) is widely used to assess cognitive impairment, its standalone efficacy is debated. This study examined the effectiveness of the MMSE alone versus in combination with other cognitive assessments in predicting dementia diagnosis, with the aim of refining the diagnostic accuracy for dementia.
A total of 2,863 participants with subjective cognitive complaints who underwent comprehensive neuropsychological assessments were included. We developed two random forest models: one using only the MMSE and another incorporating additional cognitive tests. These models were evaluated based on their accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) on a 70:30 training-to-testing split.
The MMSE-alone model predicted dementia with an accuracy of 86% and AUC of 0.872. The expanded model demonstrated increased accuracy (88%) and an AUC of 0.934. Notably, 17.46% of the cases were reclassified from dementia to non-dementia category upon including additional tests. Higher educational level and younger age were associated with these shifts.
The findings suggest that although the MMSE is a valuable screening tool, it should not be used in isolation to determine dementia severity. The addition of diverse cognitive assessments can significantly enhance diagnostic precision, particularly in younger and more educated populations. Future diagnostic protocols should integrate multifaceted cognitive evaluations to reflect the complexity of dementia accurately.
痴呆是一种影响认知功能的多方面疾病,需要准确诊断以进行有效的管理和治疗。尽管简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)被广泛用于评估认知障碍,但其单独使用的有效性仍存在争议。本研究检验了MMSE单独使用与联合其他认知评估在预测痴呆诊断方面的有效性,目的是提高痴呆的诊断准确性。
共纳入2863名有主观认知主诉并接受全面神经心理学评估的参与者。我们开发了两个随机森林模型:一个仅使用MMSE,另一个纳入了额外的认知测试。这些模型在70:30的训练与测试划分基础上,根据其准确性、精确性、召回率、F1分数和受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)进行评估。
仅使用MMSE的模型预测痴呆的准确率为86%,AUC为0.872。扩展模型显示准确率提高(88%),AUC为0.934。值得注意的是,纳入额外测试后,17.46%的病例从痴呆类别重新分类为非痴呆类别。较高的教育水平和较年轻的年龄与这些转变相关。
研究结果表明,尽管MMSE是一种有价值的筛查工具,但不应单独使用它来确定痴呆的严重程度。增加多种认知评估可以显著提高诊断精度,特别是在年轻和受教育程度较高的人群中。未来的诊断方案应整合多方面的认知评估,以准确反映痴呆的复杂性。