Suppr超能文献

股骨转子间骨折新综合分类的观察者间及观察者内可靠性

Inter- and Intra-Observer Reliability of the New Comprehensive Classification of Intertrochanteric Fracture of the Femur.

作者信息

Xu Xiaopei, Liu Yang, Diao Shuo, Zhou Junlin

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Int J Gen Med. 2025 Mar 5;18:1261-1270. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S508342. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the reliability of the new Comprehensive Classification in clinical practice by comparing it with Evans-Jensen (1975), AO/OTA (2007), and AO/OTA (2018).

METHODS

A total of 192 patients with intertrochanteric fractures were included in the study. The fractures were classified using the Comprehensive Classification system and the three traditional methods by eight observers, consisting of four high-experienced and four less-experienced surgeons. Interobserver and intraobserver agreements were assessed using kappa statistics and compared across the different classification systems.

RESULTS

The study included 192 patients. The average inter-observer Kappa values using CT scan for Evans-Jensen (1975), AO/OTA (2007), AO/OTA (2018), and Comprehensive Classification were 0.361 ± 0.06, 0.348 ± 0.05, 0.408 ± 0.06, and 0.492 ± 0.02, respectively. The average inter-observer Kappa values based on 3DR were 0.411 ± 0.04, 0.396 ± 0.03, 0.442 ± 0.03, and 0.524 ± 0.03, respectively. The average intra-observer Kappa values using CT scan were 0.467 ± 0.05, 0.453 ± 0.06, 0.542 ± 0.04, and 0.631 ± 0.02, respectively. The average intra-observer Kappa values using 3DR were 0.503 ± 0.05, 0.482 ± 0.03, 0.561 ± 0.03, and 0.672 ± 0.02, respectively. The mean kappa value of Inter- and intra-observer for the Comprehensive Classification were higher than Evans-Jensen (1975) and AO/OTA (2007/2018) using CT scans and 3DR (P < 0.05). Additionally, the high-experienced group using 3DR had the highest agreement, at approximately 75.86%, when comparing the implant type corresponding to the fracture classification evaluated by the observer with the implant type selected by the observer.

CONCLUSION

The Comprehensive Classification system emerges as a reliable and superior tool for the classification of intertrochanteric fractures, offering improved agreement rates and practical treatment insights compared to traditional methods. This classification has guiding significance for treatment.

摘要

目的

通过与Evans-Jensen(1975年)、AO/OTA(2007年)和AO/OTA(2018年)分类方法进行比较,评估新型综合分类法在临床实践中的可靠性。

方法

本研究共纳入192例转子间骨折患者。由8名观察者使用综合分类系统和三种传统方法对骨折进行分类,其中包括4名经验丰富的外科医生和4名经验较少的外科医生。使用kappa统计量评估观察者间和观察者内的一致性,并在不同分类系统之间进行比较。

结果

本研究纳入192例患者。使用CT扫描时,Evans-Jensen(1975年)、AO/OTA(2007年)、AO/OTA(2018年)和综合分类法的观察者间平均kappa值分别为0.361±0.06、0.348±0.05、0.408±0.06和0.492±0.02。基于3DR的观察者间平均kappa值分别为0.411±0.04、0.396±0.03、0.442±0.03和0.524±0.03。使用CT扫描时,观察者内平均kappa值分别为0.467±0.05、0.453±0.06、0.542±0.04和0.631±0.02。使用三维重建(3DR)时,观察者内平均kappa值分别为0.503±0.05、0.482±0.03、0.561±0.03和0.672±0.02。使用CT扫描和3DR时,综合分类法的观察者间和观察者内平均kappa值均高于Evans-Jensen(1975年)和AO/OTA(2007/2018年)(P<0.05)。此外,在将观察者评估的骨折分类对应的植入物类型与观察者选择的植入物类型进行比较时,经验丰富的外科医生使用3DR时的一致性最高,约为75.86%。

结论

综合分类系统是一种可靠且优越的转子间骨折分类工具,与传统方法相比,其一致性更高,并能提供实用的治疗见解。该分类法对治疗具有指导意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdbd/11892744/40619ee56f59/IJGM-18-1261-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验