Kaki Praneet C, Sangal Neel R, Lam Doreen, Carey Ryan M, Rajasekaran Karthik, Chalian Ara, Brody Robert M, Weinstein Gregory S, Cannady Steven B
Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Jul;173(1):40-48. doi: 10.1002/ohn.1221. Epub 2025 Mar 11.
In the unique clinical context of a retropharyngeal carotid artery (RPC), free flap reconstruction (FFR) may be used for small pathologic tumor (pT)1-2 human papillomavirus (HPV)+ oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) tumors to provide vessel coverage, providing a unique case-control study model. This study aims to elucidate the impact of FFR on functional outcomes following transoral robotic surgery (TORS).
Retrospective review of electronic medical records between 2010 and 2022.
Single-institution tertiary care center.
Cohorts were defined as FFR (with RPC) and no FFR (nFFR). A 1:2 propensity score match (PSM) was performed. The functional oral intake scale (FOIS) was used to characterize swallowing outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed in R-Studio.
Post-PSM, 93 patients met inclusion criteria (59.8 years, 92% white, 88% male). In total, 31 (33%) underwent FFR, 77 (83%) had pT2 tumors, and 87 (93%) underwent adjuvant treatment. The FFR cohort saw increased return to the operating room (FFR 19% vs nFFR 3.3%, P < .001) and mean hospital stay (7.2 ± 2.2 vs 4.9 ± 3.1 days, P = .02). Median preoperative FOIS was similar between groups (FFR: 7.00 [interquartile range (IQR) 6.00-7.00] vs nFFR: 7.0 [7.00-7.00], P = .2) with comparable decline at first follow-up. The nFFR cohort had higher FOIS at 3 and 6 months (5.00 [5.00-6.00] vs 6.00 [5.00-7.00], P = .04). FOIS was similar after 1 year (6.00 [5.00-7.00] vs 6.00 [6.00-7.00], P = .3).
FFR achieved comparable functional outcomes to nFFR at 1 year. FFR is a viable reconstructive option for pT1-2 tumors for which TORS that are amenable to surgical resection via TORS despite an anatomic barrier such as RPC.
在咽后颈动脉(RPC)这一独特的临床背景下,游离皮瓣重建术(FFR)可用于治疗小病理肿瘤(pT)1 - 2期人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)阳性的口咽鳞状细胞癌(OPSCC)肿瘤,以提供血管覆盖,从而提供一个独特的病例对照研究模型。本研究旨在阐明FFR对经口机器人手术(TORS)后功能结局的影响。
回顾性分析2010年至2022年的电子病历。
单机构三级医疗中心。
队列分为FFR组(伴有RPC)和非FFR组(nFFR)。进行1:2倾向评分匹配(PSM)。采用功能性口服摄入量表(FOIS)来描述吞咽结局。在R-Studio中进行统计分析。
PSM后,93例患者符合纳入标准(年龄59.8岁,92%为白人,88%为男性)。总共有31例(33%)接受了FFR,77例(83%)患有pT2肿瘤,87例(93%)接受了辅助治疗。FFR组返回手术室的比例增加(FFR组为19%,nFFR组为3.3%,P <.001),平均住院时间延长(7.2±2.2天 vs 4.9±3.1天,P = 0.02)。术前两组的FOIS中位数相似(FFR组:7.00[四分位间距(IQR)6.00 - 7.00] vs nFFR组:7.0[7.00 - 7.00],P = 0.2),首次随访时下降程度相当。nFFR组在3个月和6个月时的FOIS更高(5.00[5.00 - 6.00] vs 6.00[5.00 - 7.00],P = 0.04)。1年后FOIS相似(6.00[5.00 - 7.00] vs 6.00[6.00 - 7.00],P = 0.3)。
FFR在1年时的功能结局与nFFR相当。对于pT1 - 2期肿瘤,尽管存在诸如RPC等解剖学障碍,但适合通过TORS进行手术切除的情况下,FFR是一种可行的重建选择。