Ryan Meg, Zemp Charles, Abujaber Nadeen, Sonnenstuhl Marie, Alshibi Ahmad, Blum Pia Tingsted, Cheffi Ahlem, Fox Robert, Githaiga Sandra, Green Hannah, Islam Md Saidul, Jabbour Salam, Jahan Sabiha, de Matos Cátia Sofia Peres, Maurya Bhanu Pratap, McBride Kelly A, Nielsen Louise Marie Thorlund, Ockenden Nick, Rigall Nathalie Helena, Whitton Shona, Wright Namanya, Vallières Frédérique
Trinity Centre for Global Health, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Trinity Centre for Global Health, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Compr Psychiatry. 2025 May;139:152584. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2025.152584. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
The 'Integrated Model for Supervision' (IMS) offers important guidance for how to provide supportive supervision within mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) programming in humanitarian emergencies. The current study sought to (i) describe how the IMS was implemented following IMS training; (ii) assess whether delivery of the IMS training is associated with changes in a selection of theoretically supported quantitative outcomes; and (iii) elicit feedback on the IMS and its implementation process.
Data was collected from a participant pool of n = 119 individuals from six different humanitarian organisations that had previously participated in an IMS training. For the first and third objectives, interviews at 6- and 12-months post-training were conducted and thematically analysed. For the second objective, timepoint comparison analytical techniques were used across five distinct timepoints.
Quantitative findings showed significant increases in participant self-efficacy, supervision knowledge, and supervision confidence, alongside some evidence of reductions in participant burnout. Qualitatively, participants underscored the IMS's efficacy in creating supportive supervision structures within their organisations, identified barriers and facilitators to implementation and proposed strategies for sustainability. Additionally, they highlighted positive impacts of implementing the IMS on staff, organisational culture, and service quality.
DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: This study supports the effectiveness and acceptability of the IMS in enhancing the capacity of organisations to provide supportive supervision in humanitarian contexts, as key to promote the wellbeing of humanitarian MHPSS workers and the quality of the services they deliver. Challenges remain, however, to ensure sustainable implementation of the IMS, which guide ongoing efforts towards its improvement.
“综合监督模式”(IMS)为在人道主义紧急情况下的心理健康和社会心理支持(MHPSS)项目中提供支持性监督提供了重要指导。本研究旨在:(i)描述在进行IMS培训后该模式是如何实施的;(ii)评估IMS培训的开展是否与一系列理论支持的定量结果的变化相关;(iii)收集对IMS及其实施过程的反馈。
数据收集自来自六个不同人道主义组织的n = 119名参与者,这些人此前参加过IMS培训。对于第一个和第三个目标,在培训后6个月和12个月进行访谈并进行主题分析。对于第二个目标,在五个不同的时间点使用时间点比较分析技术。
定量研究结果显示,参与者的自我效能感、监督知识和监督信心显著提高,同时有证据表明参与者的倦怠有所减少。从定性角度来看,参与者强调了IMS在其组织内建立支持性监督结构方面的有效性,确定了实施的障碍和促进因素,并提出了可持续性策略。此外,他们强调了实施IMS对员工、组织文化和服务质量的积极影响。
讨论/结论:本研究支持了IMS在增强组织在人道主义背景下提供支持性监督能力方面的有效性和可接受性,这是促进人道主义MHPSS工作者的福祉及其提供服务质量的关键。然而,要确保IMS的可持续实施仍存在挑战,这为持续改进该模式提供了指导。