Reiterová Michaela, Kohlscheen Saskia, Maglia Oscar, Sala Simona, Schumich Angela, Maurer-Granofszky Margarita, Faggin Giovanni, Scarparo Pamela, Varotto Elena, Šestáková Zuzana, Švec Peter, Feuerstein Tamar, Vernitsky Helly, Kužílková Daniela, Hrušák Ondřej, Buldini Barbara, Dworzak Michael, Brüggemann Monika, Gaipa Giuseppe, Kalina Tomáš
CLIP (Childhood Leukaemia Investigation Prague), Prague, Czech Republic.
Department of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2025 Mar 13;63(7):1419-1426. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2024-1503. Print 2025 Jun 26.
Risk-based stratification approaches using measurable residual disease (MRD) successfully help to identify T-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) patients at risk of relapse, whose treatment outcomes are very poor. Because of T-ALL heterogeneity and rarity, a reliable and standardized approach for flow cytometry (FC)-based MRD measurement and analysis is often missing.
Within the international AIEOP-BFM-ALL-FLOW study group we made a consensus on markers and a standard operating procedure for common 8- and 12-color T-ALL MRD panels. Custom manufactured tubes with dried backbone antibodies were tested in parallel to local FC standards.
Altogether, 66 diagnostic and 67 day 15 samples were analyzed. We designed two guided MRD gating strategies to identify blast cells in parallel to expert-based evaluation. We proved that the optimized tubes allowed the correct identification of blast cells in all diagnostic samples. Both, expert and guided analysis of day 15 samples correlated to local standard (Spearman R=0.98 and R=0.94, respectively). Only in 2 (3 %) and 4 (6 %) patients expert gating and guided analysis results were substantially discordant from local standard, respectively. The cases that require an individualized approach may be partially identified at diagnosis through a rare immunophenotype or mixed phenotype acute leukemia status.
Our work shows that standardized operating procedures together with guided analysis are applicable in a great majority of T-ALL cases. Further improvement of MRD detection is needed, as in some cases an individualized analytical approach is still required due to the challenging nature of the T-ALL phenotype.
使用可测量残留病(MRD)的基于风险的分层方法成功地帮助识别有复发风险的T急性淋巴细胞白血病(T-ALL)患者,这些患者的治疗结果非常差。由于T-ALL的异质性和罕见性,基于流式细胞术(FC)的MRD测量和分析的可靠且标准化方法常常缺失。
在国际AIEOP-BFM-ALL-FLOW研究组内,我们就常见的8色和12色T-ALL MRD检测板的标志物和标准操作程序达成了共识。定制的带有冻干骨架抗体的试管与当地FC标准进行了平行测试。
总共分析了66份诊断样本和67份第15天的样本。我们设计了两种指导性MRD设门策略,以与基于专家的评估并行识别原始细胞。我们证明,优化后的试管能够在所有诊断样本中正确识别原始细胞。第15天样本的专家分析和指导性分析均与当地标准相关(Spearman相关系数分别为R = 0.98和R = 0.94)。仅在2例(3%)和4例(6%)患者中,专家设门和指导性分析结果分别与当地标准存在明显差异。通过罕见的免疫表型或混合表型急性白血病状态,在诊断时可能部分识别出需要个体化方法的病例。
我们的工作表明,标准化操作程序与指导性分析适用于绝大多数T-ALL病例。由于T-ALL表型的挑战性,在某些情况下仍需要个体化分析方法,因此MRD检测仍需进一步改进。