Suppr超能文献

探索自我引导式总结汇报在基于模拟的教育中的作用:是时候挑战现状了吗?

Exploring the role of self-led debriefings within simulation-based education: time to challenge the status quo?

作者信息

Kumar Prashant, Harrison Neil Malcolm, McAleer Katy, Khan Ibraaheem, Somerville Susan Geraldine

机构信息

Department of Medical Education, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Scotland, UK.

School of Medicine, Dentistry & Nursing, University of Glasgow, Scotland, UK.

出版信息

Adv Simul (Lond). 2025 Mar 11;10(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s41077-025-00342-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The notion that debriefing quality is highly reliant on the skills and expertise of the facilitator is being increasingly challenged. There is therefore emerging interest in self-led debriefings (SLDs), whereby following a simulated learning event, individuals or groups of learners conduct a debriefing amongst themselves, without the immediate presence of a trained facilitator. The interest in this approach to debriefing is multifactorial but is, in part, driven by a desire to reduce costs associated with resource-intensive faculty presence. The debate regarding the role of SLDs in simulation-based education (SBE) therefore has important implications for the simulation community.

MAIN BODY

We comprehensively explore the role of SLDs by contextualising their application across the spectrum of SBE, both in terms of contrasting simulation factors, namely (i) simulation modality, (ii) debriefing forum, and (iii) debriefing adjuncts, as well as different learner characteristics, namely (i) learners' previous simulation experience, (ii) learner numbers, and (iii) learners' professional and cultural backgrounds. These factors inherently shape the conduct and format of SLDs, and thus impact their effectiveness in influencing learning. We have synthesised and critically analysed the available literature to illuminate this discussion.

CONCLUSIONS

The current evidence suggests that SLDs can, in the right circumstances, form part of an effective debriefing strategy and support learners to reach appropriate levels of critical self-reflection and learning. Careful consideration and due diligence must go into the design and implementation of SLDs to augment the advantages of this debriefing format, such as enhancing flexibility and learner autonomy, whilst mitigating potential risks, such as reinforcing errors and biases or causing psychological harm. In situations where resources for facilitator-led debriefings (FLDs) are limited, simulation educators should recognise SLDs as a potential avenue to explore in their local contexts. By leveraging the strengths of both formats, balancing learner autonomy and expert guidance, a combined SLD and FLD approach may yet prove to be the optimal debriefing strategy to maximise learning. Whilst more research is needed to deepen our understanding of the nuances of SLDs to assess their true applicability across the spectrum of SBE, the time may now have arrived to consider challenging the status quo.

摘要

背景

复盘质量高度依赖引导者的技能和专业知识这一观念正受到越来越多的挑战。因此,人们对自我引导式复盘(SLD)的兴趣日益浓厚,即在模拟学习活动之后,学习者个人或小组在没有训练有素的引导者即时在场的情况下自行进行复盘。对这种复盘方法的兴趣是多方面的,但部分原因是希望降低与资源密集型师资在场相关的成本。因此,关于自我引导式复盘在基于模拟的教育(SBE)中的作用的争论对模拟社区具有重要意义。

主体

我们通过将自我引导式复盘的应用置于整个基于模拟的教育范围内进行情境化,全面探讨其作用,这涉及对比模拟因素,即(i)模拟方式、(ii)复盘论坛和(iii)复盘辅助工具,以及不同的学习者特征,即(i)学习者以前的模拟经验、(ii)学习者人数和(iii)学习者的专业和文化背景。这些因素从本质上塑造了自我引导式复盘的实施和形式,从而影响其在促进学习方面的有效性。我们综合并批判性地分析了现有文献以阐明这一讨论。

结论

目前的证据表明,在适当的情况下,自我引导式复盘可以成为有效复盘策略的一部分,并支持学习者达到适当水平的批判性自我反思和学习。在设计和实施自我引导式复盘时,必须仔细考虑并尽职调查,以增强这种复盘形式的优势,如提高灵活性和学习者自主性,同时降低潜在风险,如强化错误和偏见或造成心理伤害。在由引导者主导的复盘(FLD)资源有限的情况下,模拟教育工作者应认识到自我引导式复盘是在当地环境中可探索的潜在途径。通过利用两种形式的优势,平衡学习者自主性和专家指导,自我引导式复盘与引导者主导的复盘相结合的方法可能最终被证明是使学习最大化的最佳复盘策略。虽然需要更多研究来加深我们对自我引导式复盘细微差别之处的理解,以评估其在整个基于模拟的教育范围内的真正适用性,但现在可能是时候考虑挑战现状了。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0b7/11895349/ef825203e02d/41077_2025_342_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验