Suppr超能文献

临床实践指南的传播策略——混合方法证据综合方案

Dissemination strategies of clinical practice guidelines-mixed methods evidence synthesis protocol.

作者信息

Nagraj Sumanth Kumbargere, Hafver Tandekile Lubelwana, Hohlfeld Ameer, Effa Emmanuel, Mabetha Denny, Kunje Gertrude, Shen Yan Jiao, Zaror Carlos, Lakudzala Suzgika, Mpando Talitha, van de Velde Stijn, Agoritsas Thomas, Delvaux Nicolas, Vandvik Per Olav

机构信息

MAGIC Evidence Ecosystem Foundation, Lovisenberg gata, Oslo, Norway.

Centre for Evidence-Based Health Care, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.

出版信息

Clin Public Health Guidel. 2025 Feb 8;2(2):e70012. doi: 10.1002/gin2.70012.

Abstract

Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are shared through various dissemination strategies using a range of dissemination products and channels. However, users may have different needs for accessing and understanding them. Patients and carers from low- and middle-income countries might face challenges in accessing CPGs such as inadequate systems for printed book distribution and insufficient and substandard photocopies. Many organizations offer lengthy documents, but busy healthcare workers may prefer shorter, digital versions. Digital CPGs can be sent through different channels such as email, newsletters, or social media. How users feel about these products (e.g., clinical protocol, educational material or decision aids) and how it affects the usage of CPGs is not well understood. In addition to these issues, most of the previous systematic reviews on this topic have clubbed the dissemination strategies along with the adoption of recommendations or implementation aspects. There is a need for evidence on the existing dissemination strategies disentangled from the implementation aspects. We aim to conduct a mixed-methods systematic review to identify documented dissemination strategies for CPGs, barriers and facilitators to access such strategies and the expectations and needs of end users regarding dissemination needs. We will search literature from MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, Epistemonikos, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and Medical Guidelines Clearing house. We will critically appraise all the included studies using appropriate tools based on the study design. We will use manifest content analysis to identify documented dissemination strategies and latent content analysis to understand the barriers, facilitators, preferences of end-users. We intend to follow the convergent matrix model approach for this mixed methods evidence synthesis. We anticipate that this mixed-methods systematic review will highlight the various strategies of dissemination of CPGs and the associated barriers and facilitators.

摘要

临床实践指南(CPGs)通过各种传播策略,利用一系列传播产品和渠道进行共享。然而,用户在获取和理解这些指南时可能有不同的需求。低收入和中等收入国家的患者及护理人员在获取临床实践指南时可能面临挑战,比如印刷书籍分发系统不完善,影印件数量不足且质量不合格。许多组织提供冗长的文件,但忙碌的医护人员可能更喜欢简短的数字版本。数字临床实践指南可以通过不同渠道发送,如电子邮件、时事通讯或社交媒体。用户对这些产品(如临床方案、教育材料或决策辅助工具)的感受以及它如何影响临床实践指南的使用,目前还不太清楚。除了这些问题,之前关于这个主题的大多数系统评价都将传播策略与建议的采纳或实施方面混在一起。需要有与实施方面分开的关于现有传播策略的证据。我们旨在进行一项混合方法的系统评价,以确定已记录的临床实践指南传播策略、获取此类策略的障碍和促进因素,以及终端用户在传播需求方面的期望和需求。我们将检索MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、科学网、Scopus、Epistemonikos、医疗保健研究与质量机构以及医学指南信息中心的文献。我们将根据研究设计使用适当的工具对所有纳入研究进行严格评估。我们将使用显性内容分析来确定已记录的传播策略,使用潜在内容分析来了解障碍、促进因素以及终端用户的偏好。我们打算采用收敛矩阵模型方法进行这种混合方法的证据综合。我们预计,这项混合方法的系统评价将突出临床实践指南传播的各种策略以及相关的障碍和促进因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b070/7617474/5e464a8f27fd/EMS203438-f001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验