Pappas C G, Fowler J W, Bennett D A, Doriese W B, Joe Y I, Morgan K M, O'Neil G C, Ullom J N, Swetz D S
Quantum Sensors Group, NIST Boulder Laboratories, 325 Broadway, MS 687.08, Boulder, Colorado 80305, USA.
J Low Temp Phys. 2018;193(3-4). doi: 10.1007/s10909-018-1999-8.
Transition-edge sensor X-ray microcalorimeters are usually calibrated empirically, as the most widely-used calibration metric, optimal filtered pulse height (OFPH), in general has an unknown dependance on photon energy, . Because the calibration function can only be measured at specific points where photons of a known energy can be produced, this unknown dependence of OFPH on leads to calibration errors and the need for time-intensive calibration measurements and analysis. A calibration metric that is nearly linear as a function of could help alleviate these problems. In this work, we assess the linearity of a physically motivated calibration metric, . We measure calibration pulses in the range with detectors optimized for 6 keV photons to compare the linearity properties of to OFPH. In these test data sets, we find that fits a linear function an order of magnitude better than OFPH. Furthermore, calibration functions using , an optimized version of , are linear within the 2-3 eV noise of the data.
过渡边缘传感器X射线微热量计通常是通过经验校准的,因为最广泛使用的校准指标——最佳滤波脉冲高度(OFPH),一般对光子能量有未知的依赖性。由于校准函数只能在能产生已知能量光子的特定点进行测量,OFPH对光子能量的这种未知依赖性会导致校准误差,并且需要进行耗时的校准测量和分析。一种作为光子能量函数几乎呈线性的校准指标有助于缓解这些问题。在这项工作中,我们评估了一种基于物理原理的校准指标的线性度。我们使用针对6 keV光子优化的探测器,在一定范围内测量校准脉冲,以比较该指标与OFPH的线性特性。在这些测试数据集中,我们发现该指标对线性函数的拟合比OFPH好一个数量级。此外,使用该指标的优化版本进行校准的函数在数据的2 - 3 eV噪声范围内是线性的。